M/S. Supermax Personal Care Pvt Ltd v. Appellate Deputy Commissioner (Ct)
This judgment came from a scanned document and its text layer is unreliable — words may be garbled. Check the original PDF before relying on any passage.
[ 32es ] HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTYTWO PRESENT i THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE UJJAL BHUYAN AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. BHASKAR REDDY j WRIT PETITION NO: 23045 OF 2020 Between:
M/s. Supermax Personal Care Pvt ltd, No. 2, Jeedimetla Rd, Phase 1, IDA Jeedimetla, Chinthal, Jeedimetla, Hyderabad, Telangana 500055 Represented by its Authorized Signatory Madhavi Mudda, D/o. T Rammohan Rao, Aged about 50 years, Rl/o Hyderabad ...PETITIONER AND Appellate Deputy Commissioner (CT/Appellate Joint Commissioner (ST) Hyderabad Rural Division 1.
Commercial Tax Officer, IDA Gandhinagar Circle, Hyderabad State of Telangana, represented by the Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Telangana Secretariat, Hyderabad. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, direction or order more particularty in the nature of a writ of mandamus declaring the assessment order A.O.No.30710 .dated 3 1-05-20'1 8 passed by the Respondent No.2 and consequently the impugned ADC Order No. 1215 dated 29-06-2020 passed by the Respondent No. 1 as being void, illegal, violative of Article 265 and consequently Article 286 of the Constitution of lndia, totally without jurisdiction and violative of the principles of natural justice.
lA NO: 1 OF 2020 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings and consequential actions pursuant to the assessment order A.O.No.30710 dated 31-03-2018 passed by the Respondent No. 2 and consequently the impugned ADC Order No. 1215 dated 29-06-2020 passed by the Respondent No. 1.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI M. NAGA DEEPAK Counsel forthe Respondents No.1 & 2: SRI K. RAJI REDDY (sc FoR coMMERCTAL TAX) Counsel for the Respondent No.3: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE UJJAL BHIryAN AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.BHASKAR REDDY WRIT PETITION No.23O45 of 2O2O ORDER: Per the Hon'ble the Chief Justice Ujjal BLtuAan) Heard Mr. M.Naga Deepak, learned counsel for the Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. K.Raji respondents.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that pursuant to One Time Settlement (OTS) Scheme introduced by the Government of Telangana, petitioner has settled the tax dispute with the State. Therefore, petitioner would like to withdraw the writ petition.
3.
In view of the above, writ petition is dismissed on withdrawal.
Miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shali stand closed. However, there shall be no order as to costs. SD/.N.CHANDRA SEKHAR RAO ASSISTAN STRAR \ i /TTRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To,
1. One CC to SRI M. NAGA DEEPAK, Advocate [OPUC]
2. One CC to SRI K. RAJI REDDY (SC FOR COMMERCIAL TAX) IOPUC]
3. Two CCs to GP FOR REVENUE, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad [OUT]
4. Two CCs to GP FOR COMMERCIAL TAX, High Court for the State of Telangana at HYderabad [OUT]
5. Two CD CoPi BB SW
HIGH COURT DATED: 30|1212022
ORDER
-/-'a ./.
l. _.1 WP.No.23045 of 2020 I fo J t1 Its 1s11 %-p ,7 DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS I l r-)v ) 1,o )