M/S. Supermax Personal Care Pvt Ltd v. Appellate Deputy Commissioner
This judgment came from a scanned document and its text layer is unreliable — words may be garbled. Check the original PDF before relying on any passage.
/ [ 32s5 I HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO PRESENT THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE UJJAL BHUYAN AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. BHASKAR REDDY WRIT PETITION NO: 23020 OF 2020 Between:
M/s. Supermax Personal Care Pvt. Ltd., No. 2, Jeedimetla Road, Phase 1, IDA Jeedimetla, Chinthal, Jeedimetla, Hyderabad, Telangana 500055, Represented by its Authorized Signatory Madhavi Mudda, D/o. T Rammohan Rao, Aged about 50 years, R/o Hyderabad.
...PETITIONER AND
1. Appellate Deputy Commissioner, (CT)/ Appellate Joint Commissioner (ST) Hyderabad Rural Division.
2. Commercial Tax Officer, IDA Gandhinagar Circle, Hyderabad
3. State of Telangana, represented by the Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Telangana Secretariat, Hyderabad. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, direction or order more particularly in the nature of a writ of mandamus declaring the assessment order A.O.No.41041 dated 1410812019 passed by the Respondent No. 2 and consequently the impugned ADC Order No.2172 dated 25/1112020 passed by the Respondent No. 1 as being void, illegal, violative of Article 265 and consequently Article 286 of the Constitution of lndia, totally without jurisdiction and violative of the principles of natural justice. lA NO: 1 OF 2020 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay
./ all further proceelings and consequential actions pursuan to the assessment order A.O.No.4'1C41 dated 14lOBl2O19 passed by the Re:,ponded No. 2 and consequently the rpugned ADC Order No.2172 dated 2511 i/2020 passed by the Respondent No. 1.
Counsel for the P )titioner: SRI M.NAGA DEEPAK Counsel for the R -'spondents: SRI K.RAJI REDDY The Court made t re following: ORDER
/ THE HON'BLE THD CHIEF JUSTICE UJJAL BHIIYAJ{ AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.BHASKAR REDDY WRIT PETITION No.23O2O ot 2O2O ORDER: Per the Hon'ble tl@ Chief Justice Ujjal Bhugan) Heard Mr. M.Naga Deepak, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. K.Raji Reddy, learned counsel for the respondents.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that pursuant to One Time Settlement (OTS) Scheme introduced by the Government of Telangana, petitioner has settled the tax dispute with the State. Therefore, petitioner would like to withdraw the writ petition.
3.
In view of the above, writ petition is dismissed on withdrawal.
Miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand ciosed. However, there shall be no order as to costs. SD/-N.CHANDRA SEKHAR RAO ASSISTANJ REGISTRAR ( -ls //TRUE COPY// I SECTION OFFICER To
1. One CC to SRI M.NAGA DEEPAK, Advocate [OPUC]
2. One CC to SRI K.RAJI REDDY, Advocate IOPUC]
3. Two CD Copies PSK.
BS ;w
HIGH COU 1T DATED:3011212022 .4 ,l:',-ij (: ci.
ORDER
WP.No.23020 of 2020 3 1 JIN ?0?3 DISMISS!NG OF THE WRIT PETITION ON WITHD RAWAL WITHOUT COSTS.
&('ot 1 'L1,