Veera Reddy v. E.J. David And 3 Others

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY ,THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEIVBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE PRESENT THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE N.TUKARAMJI CONTEMPT APPEAL Nos :21 OF 2020, 1 and 2 of2021 C.A. No. 21 of 2020 Contempt Appeal Under Section 19 of Contempt of Gourts Act against the order dated 15-12-2020 in C.C. No. 712 of 2020 on the file of the High Court Between:

Veera Reddy, S/o. Venkat Narayan Reddy, aged about 52 years, Additional Collector, Sangareddy Division Sangareddy District, Telangana State. ...APPELLANT / PETITIONER

1. E.J. David S/o. Late E.J.John, Aged about 60 years, Occ. Business, Rl/o. H.No.'1-2-49lG1, Christian Colony Mahboobnagar District, Telangana State.

2. K. Saraswathi, Tahasildar/Mandal Revenue Officer, Kandi Mandal (Previously Sangareddy Mandal) Sangareddy District, Telangana State.

3. S. Sreenu, Revenue Divisional Officer, Sangareddy Division, Sangareddy District, Telangana State,

4. Ramadevi, Tahsilda ri lt4a nda I Revenue Officer, Kandi l\rlandal, (Previously Sangareddy lt/andal) Sangareddy District, Telangana State. (Present II,/RO) (Respondent Nos. 2 to 4 are not necessary parties in this contempt appeal) .,.RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Appellant: SRI D. JAGAN MOHAN REDDY Counsel for the Respondent No.1 : SRI K. S. MURTHY coNTEMPT APPEAL NO: 1 OF 2021 Contempt Appeal Under Section 19 of Contempt of Courts Act against the order dated '15-12-2020 in C.C. No. 1681 of 2019 on the file of the High Court Between:

S. Sreenu, S/o. Thavurya, Aged about 42years, Occ.Revenue Divisional Officer R/o. Yellareddy Divisioh Kamareddy Distiict.

---APPELLANT / PETITIONER / RESPONDENT NO. 2

1. E.J. David, S/o. Late E.J.John Aged about 60 years, Occ. Business R/o H.No.1 -2-49lG1, Christian Colony lr/ahboobnagar District, Telangana State.

2. K. Saraswath Tahasildar/Mandal Revenue Officer Kandi Mandal,(Prev :usly Sangareddy Mandal) Sangareddy l)istrict, Telangana State.

3. Ramadevi, Te rsildar/Mandal Revenue Officer, Kandi lltanrjal,(previously S.angareddy I landal) Sangareddy District, Telangana {itatu.. (present MRO)

4. Lakshma Red iy, Joint Sub-Registrar- l, Sanga Reddy District Telangana State.

(Respondent Nol . 2 to 4 are not necessary parties in this oontempt appeal) ..,ItESPONDENTS Counsel for the App ,llant: THE ADVOCATE GENERAL Counsel for the Resl ,ondent No.1 : SRI K. S. MURTHY CONTEMPT APPEAL NO: 2 OF 2021 Contempt Ap6 eal Under Section 19 of Contempt of Courts ,Act against the order dated 15-12-2 )20 in C.C. No. 1681 of 2019 on the file c,f the High Court Between:

Smt. U. Ramade' i, W/o. M. Madhava Rao, Aged 4g years Occ. Government Service. Presently vorking as Tahsildar, KondapuiMandal Sar gareddy District ... Appellant / Petitioner / Respondent No. 3

1. E.J. David, S/o Late E.J.John Aged about 60 years, Occ. Business R/o , H.No. 1-2-491G1 , Chr stran Colony I\/ahboobnagar District, Telanggana State

2. K. Saraswathi, -ahasildar/lt/a ndal Revenue Offtcer Kandi Mandral,(previously Sangareddy lr,4; ndal) Sangareddy District, Telangana State.

3. S. Sreenu, Rev rnue Divisional Officer, Sangareddy Division/ Sangareddy District, Telangi na State

4. Ljrkshma Redd , Joint Sub-Registrar - l, Sanga Reddy District Telangana State. (Respondent N, s. 2 to 4 are not necessary parties in ihis ccntempt a-ppeal) ...RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Appe llant: THE ADVOCATE GENERAL Counsel for the Resp rndent No.1 : SRI K. S. MURTHY The Court made the following: COMMON ORDER

THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SATISI{ CHANDRA SHARMA THE HO N'BLE SRI JUSTICE N CONTEMPf APPEAL Nos.21 of2O20. 1 and 2 of2021 COMMON JUDGMENTT eer dE tron,bte theCl,e/J,srrc€ sa!6h chan ctra sha.mo) The appellants are present in Court. At the outset, the appellants have tendered an unconditional apologz for any act or omission made inadvertently in good faith which may amount to disobedience of the order passed by this Court. They have also stated that they have got high regards for the orders passed by this Court and they have always made all possibie endeavours to implement the orders passed by this Court liom time to time.

It has been informed that the order passed by this Court has been complied with.

In the considered opinion of this Court, though there is a delay in complying with the order passed by this Court, however, the fact is that the orcter passed by this Court has been complied with and therefore, the present Contempt Appeals stand disposed of and the sentence imposed on the appellants by the leal'ned Single Judge is hereby set aside. There shall be no order as to costs.

":[,'-THEt?$[tR //rRUE coPY/ t Ci) SECTION OFFICER To, Sri.Veera Reddy, S/o. _Venkat Narayan Reddy, aged about 52 years, Additional Collector, Sangareddy Division Sangareddy Districl, Tetangana State. K, Saraswathi, Tahasildar/Mandal Revenu6 Officer, Kandil/andal (prevlously Sangareddy lt/andal) Sangareddy District, Telangana State. S. Sreenu, Revenue Divisional Officer, Sangareddy Division, Sangareddy District, Telangana State.

1.

2.

3.

C.' "'{'l "-'

4- Ramadevi, Tahsi, jar/Mandal Revenue Officer, Kandi Mandal, (Pn:viouslySangaredily Man ial) Sangareddy District, Telangana State. (Present MRO)

5. Two- CCS io Tht Advocate General , High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad.

6. Oire CC to SRl. l' .S, MURTHYAdvocate IOPUCI

7. One CC to Sri D. Jagan Mohan Reddy, Advocate (OPUC)

8. Two CD Copies

9. One Spare Copy KUL k

HIGH COURT DATED:31 11212021 t\E l-.i l"A ;('

r,1 Y :I \-.

1 8 JAH 2022 i o 7.

I Common Orde'

Contempt Appeal I i os . 21 OF 2020 . I AND 2 0b- 202r DISPOSTNC OF THE CC \TEMPT APPEALS.

*Y/ ^ / \ot \r,\