← Library
High Court for State of TelanganaCRLP/15275/2013allowed no costs

Smt.Neelamma v. The State Of Ap.,

2013-12-31R.Kantha Rao3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND THIRTEEN :PRESENT:

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R.KANTHA RAO CRL.P. NO:15275 of 2013 Between:

1 Smt.Neelamma W/o Sudhakara Chary 2 Vadla Sudhakaar chary S/o Manaiah 3 Smt.Nagalakshmi W/o Sidda Chary 4 Sidda Chary W/o Vishwanatham ..... Petitioners/Accused 2 to 5 AND The State of AP., Through Police, Balanagar, Rep by its Public Prosecutor High Court of AP., Hyderabad .....Respondent/Complainant Petition under Section 438 of Cr.P.C., praying that in the circumstances stated in the petition and the grounds filed herein, the High Court may be pleased to release the petitioners on bail in the event of their arrest in Crime No.233/2013 of PS., Balanagar Mahabubnagar District.

The petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the petition and the grounds filed herein and upon hearing the arguments of Sri M.Achuta Reddy, Advocate for the Petitioners and of the Addl. Public Prosecutor for the Respondent, the Court made the following. ORDER:

"This criminal petition is filed by the petitioners-A2 to A5 under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking anticipatory bail in Crime No.233 of 2013 of Balanagar Police Station, Mahabubnagar District, registered for the offence punishable under Section 498-A of IPC.

2. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners - A2 to A5 and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor representing the respondent-State.

3. The de facto complainant, who was working as MPH,

ANM developed physical contact with the first accused and became pregnant. According to her, the first accused promised her to marry but subsequently refused to marry her. The allegation against the petitioners - A2 to A5 is that they are forcing the first accused not to marry the de facto complainant by saying that she became pregnant by some other person. I do not see any active involvement of the petitioners - A2 to A5 in the commission of offence alleged. Therefore, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to petitioners - A2 to A5.

4. In the result, the Criminal Petition is allowed and the petitioners-A2 to A5 are therefore directed to surrender before the Station House Officer, Balanagar Police Station, Mahabubnagar District, within twenty days from today and thereafter, they shall be released on bail on their executing personal bonds for a sum of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees ten thousand only) each with two sureties for the like sum each to the satisfaction of the said SHO."

ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// For ASSISTANT REGISTRAR To

1. The I Additional Sessions Judge, Mahabubnagar District

2. The Judicial First Class Magistrate, Jadcherla, Mahabubnagar District

3. The Station House Officer, Balanagar Police Station, Mahabubnagar District

4. Two CCs to Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P., Hyderabad (OUT)

5. One Spare Copy

6. One Cc to Sri M.Achutha Reddy, Advocate (OPUC) HIGH COURT AB DRAFTED ON 2-1-2014 RKRJ

DATE: 31-12-2013

ORDER

CRL.P. NO. 15275 OF 2013 DIRECTION