← Library
High Court for State of TelanganaCC/1181/2022closed no costs

Smt K. Ambika v. Sri D.S Lokesh Kumar, I.A.S

2023-12-29T.Madhavi Devi5 pages

This judgment came from a scanned document and its text layer is unreliable — words may be garbled. Check the original PDF before relying on any passage.

J J.h +

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY THE TWENTY NINTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE T.MADHAVI DEVI CONTEM PTCASE NO: 11810F 2022 Contempt Case filed under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1g71 to punish the respondents for their willful oi"oo"oi"n"" and violations of the order passed by this Honble court dated: 09.03. 2022 in WP 35355/201 8 :l.j Between:

1. Smt K. Ambika, Wo K Prabhakar Reddy, Aged 46 Years' Occ ' E;"; FidiA, nvti H No- 4-2-45t1, Attapur, Hvderabad'

2. Smt G.Maniu Wo G.Penta Reddy, aged 47 .years'. Occ: House - ilil, R/; elrr-+, Hyo"rsuda, Rajehdrahagar, Hvderabad' f .i[,, 'f,;.- i

3. M/s Priority Projects, n"p-!.y^Y.. gltg:h Bahu' Flat No' 513' " iiliit"d;Ai"ade,'Plot No. eo0/46/A, SR Nasar, Hvdera bad' ...PETITIONERS/ PETITIONERS AND

1. Sri D.S Lokesh Kumar, l.A.S, Commissioner Greater Hyderabad ' r,arni"ipiLCorporation Tank, Bund Hyderabad, Telangana

2. Sri K Srinivas-Rao, Chief City Planner,Greater Hyderabad - Municipal Corporation Tank,-Bund Hyderabad' Telangana

3. Sri V Anil Kumar l.A.S, Commissioner Endowment Department, Dharmikabhavan,Hyderabad, Telangana.

4. Sri V Mohan Rao, S/o V Ramachander Rao, Aged 51 Years, Occ. Eiecutive Officer, Sri Surya Chandra Swamy Temple Endowment Department, Dharmikabhavan, Hyderabad, Telangana :i ..:r:'

...RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS !

k9B IA NO: 1 oF 2022 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the ,{'t -t, iq circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant leave to initiate the contempt proceedings against 4th respondent l Counsel for the Petitioner(s):SRl. Sourabh Agarwal Counsel for the Respondent No.1 and 2: Praveen Kumar Veerjala (sc FoR GHMC) .', Counsel for the Respondent No.3: GP for Endowments Counsel for the Respondent No.4: M/s. Jagan Mohan Reddy Lotha iI if The Court made the following: ORDER i -l if.'

. i..tr '

l, i l i jli ',-r.*:

.&#.

.?-'

THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE T. MADHAVI DEVI CONTEMPT CASE No.Il8L OF 2022 ORDER:

The Contempt Case is filed seeking punishment to the respondents under Section 1O to 12 of Contempt of Court Act, for violation ald wilful disobedience in implementation of the final orders of this Court dated O9.O3.2O22 passed in W.P.No.35355 of 2O 18 and to pass such other order or orders. 2.

Learned counsel for the contemnors submitted that the order of this Court has been complied with and prayed for closure of the Contempt Case.

3.

Learned counsel for the petitioners has also confirmed the said submission.

4.

Recording the said submission, the Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs.

Miscellaneous Petitions, pending if any, shall starrd closed.

SdI CH.VENKATES DEPUTY REG ISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER i:

$ To, t,

1. One CC to SRI SOURABH AGARWAL Advocate [OPUC]

2. One CC to SRI PRAVEEN KUMAR VEERJALA (SC FOR GHMC) loPUCl

3. One CC to Sri. L.Jagan Mohan Reddy Advocate [OPUC]

4. Two CCs to GP for Endowments [OUT]

5. Two CD Copies AA ^xzz gh t\'<

({ ,!

. ,.:1, {ri.:l.$ ': -,1 F.

HIGH COURT DATED: 29fl212023 ^i (- Y .)o 2 0 r,lAB zilA o \ a!

t !

,it ;i', ilF :Dr',TC'\,t,.$ * :ii.t i.t a

ORDER

CC.No.1181 ot 2022 { ':;. s r. - .'.f , -n, .f THE CONTEMPT CASE IS CLOSED - WITHOUT COSTS *S"tO b