← Library
High Court for State of TelanganaMACMA/593/2006dismissed as infructuous

Sampangi Ramana And 3 ORS. v. G. Nagabhushanam And 2 ORS.

2026-01-21B.R.Madhusudhan Rao2 pages

This judgment came from a scanned document and its text layer is unreliable — words may be garbled. Check the original PDF before relying on any passage.

2698 l t HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAy OF NOVEMB_E-EI---- TWO THOUSAND AND NINETEEN :PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.AMARNATH GOUD IA No. 4 OF 2019 IN MACMA NO: 593 OF 2006 Between i

1. Sampangi

2. Sampangi Ramana W/o. Late Sampangi Rambabu.

Ramulamma, Wo.Yellaiah ... Petitioners/Ap pella nts 1 & 3 (Petitioner in MACIYA- 593 OF 2006 on the ii6 of High Court) AND

1. G. Nagabhushanam S/o. Ramaiah Driver of Tractor & Trailer bearing No. Ap20 U 832 & AP 20 U 833 R/o.Thumma lapalli Village Konijerla mandal, Khammam District.

2. B. Venkatanarayana, S/o, Gopaiah Owner of Tractor & Trailefbearing No.AP20 U 832 & AP 20 U 833 R/o.Thummalapalli Village Konijerla mandal, Khammam District.

3. The New India Assurance Company Limited rep., by its, Branch Manager, OId Club Road, Khammam. Insurer of Tractor and trailer bearing No. AP 20 U 832 & AP 20U 833, Vide Policy No, 6L0902lll/00/07049 (Valid From 11.12.2000 to 10.12.2001) /'

4. Sampangi Yellaiah, S/o.Ramulu (died)

5. Sampangi Venkata Ramana, D/o. Yella ia l2_pinor R/o. Thummalapalli Village, Konijerla mandal, Khammam District ( 4th and 5th respondents are not necessary parties ) *-"- t*",r;;5""#,ilElil Counsel for the Petitioners Counsel for the Respondent No.3 -: SRI KADARU PRABHAKAR RAO ,:SRIRSRIDHAR Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to apportion the award amount of Rs.7,14,800/- along with interest igJavour of the appellant No. 1 & 3 and permit to with draw the same after deppfrt in the interest of justice, Pending disposal of MACMA No.593 of 2006, preferred to the High Court against the order and decree in Op No.214 of 2001 dated 02.09.2005 passed by the learned II Additional District J udge-cu m-Chairman, Motor Vehicle tggidents Claims Tribunal (Fast Track Court I) at Khammam.

The Court made the following

ORDER

The amount awarded by the Tribunal with interest shall be paid in the ratio of 600/o in favour of the 1't petitioner/wife of the deceased, and 4oolo in favour of the 3'd petitioner/ mother of the deceased, and petitioners are at liberty to withdraw the same without furnishing any security. The application is accordingly ordered.

Sd/- NI. 1VIANJI-JL.,t ASSISTANT t-l ISTRAIl //IRUE COPY I/ SECT]ON OFFICER To,

1. The II Additional District ludge-cum-Chairman, Motor Vehlcle Accidents Clalms Tribunal (Fast Track Court I) at Khammam -_.--'

2. One CC to Sri Kadaru Prabhakar Rao Advocate IOPUC]

3. One CC to Sri R Sridhar Advocate IOPUC] L--

4. One spare copy

HIGH COURT TAJ DATED:22/ LL/ 2OLg

ORDER

IA No. 4OF 20tg IN MACMA NO: 593 OF 2006 \_., t DIRECTION