Kallepu Vidyasagar Rao And Another v. Sri. Krishna Aditya And Another
This judgment came from a scanned document and its text layer is unreliable — words may be garbled. Check the original PDF before relying on any passage.
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTYTWO PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A.ABHISHEK REDDY CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1334OF 2022 Contempt case under Section 10 lo 12 of Contempt of Courts Act to Punish the Respondents herein for violating, disobeying the Orders of the High Court dated. 17.O9.2021 W.P.No. 22419 of 2021 . Between:
1. Kallepu Vidyasagar Rao, S/o. Madhava Rao, Age 56 years, Occ Agriculture and Business, R/o. H.No. 2-9-446, Snehanagar, Hanamkonda, Warangal District.
2. Kallepu Sumalatha, W/o. Vidyasagar Rao, Age 48 Years, Occ Housewife, Rt/o- H.No. 2-9-446, Snehanagar, Hanamkonda, Warangal District. ...PETITIONERS/PETITIONERS.
AND
1. Sri. Krishna Aditya, The District Collector, Mulugu District, Mulugu.
2. Sri. Satyanarayana Swamy, The Tahsildar and Joint Sub Registrar, Mulugu, Mulugu Proper, Mandal and District.
...RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS No'S. 2 & 3 Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. K VENUMADHAV Counsel for the Respondent No. R1 and R2: G.P. for Revenue (TS) The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HC N'BLE SRI IUSTICE A. ABHISI{EK l(trDI)Y CONTEMPT CASE No.1334 of 2022 ORDER:
This Co rtempt Case is filed alleging willlui disoiredience to the order date777.09.2021 passed by this Court in V/.1).No.22419 of2027.
The respondent No.2 has filed a counter-affi lavit stating that the onlfu re applications of the petitioners t^'(l)'e already considered an 1 rejected aide ord.er dated 18.06.2021 i.e., much prior to the o der dated 17.09.2021 passed by this iiruri: in the writ petition.
Having :egard to the above, this Contenrpt C,rsr-' is closed leaving it ope r to the petitioners to challengr: the o.rdel dated 18.06.202'l befc re appropriate forum, if they are so ag1;rievt:d. Miscella reous Applications, if any pending, shall also stand closed. T rere shall be no order as to costs. Sd/. T.SRINIVAS //TRUE copy// Dl:PUw.RE?rsrRAR l'+t).,- To, sEcTtoN oFFICER '1. Two CCs to G p. for Revenue, High Court for the State of Telangitna, at Hyderabad (O jT)
2. Sri. Krishna A< itvb. Tne Distr_ict C_ollector, Mulugu District, I\lulugu.
3. Sri. Satyanara ,and Swamy, Th; T"h;iil;;"^jj"iii"dru R,)sistrar, Mutusu. _ Mulugu Proper. Mandal and Oistrict. - -
4. One CC to SF t. K VENUMADHAV, Advocate IOPUC]
5. Two CD Copie;
\ PR \ \"
HIGH COURT DATED:30'1212022 l l a{ C,s, 1HE S i4 )'{:
ORDER
/, ti :l ) 2 B ,illt zltl ( CC.No.1334 of 2022 )t+ \ it CLOSING'IHE C ]NTEMPT CASE @, \r-.