Mohd. Faizuddin v. K. Satyanarayana Reddy
This judgment came from a scanned document and its text layer is unreliable — words may be garbled. Check the original PDF before relying on any passage.
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE LAXMI NARAYANA ALISHETTY ctry ctvtL COURT APPEALNO: 225OF2006 Appeal filed under Section 96 of CpC aggrieved by the Judgment and Decree dated 08.09.2006 passed in o.S.No.518 of 2oo1 on the file of the court of the X Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad. Between:
Mohd. Faizuddin, S/o Mohd. Abdul kareem, Occ: Business, R/o 17-.1_304/4 Edi Bazar Hyderabad.
...AppellanUPltf.
AND
1. [.^S,g!alar.ayana Reddy, S/o Tirupathi Reddy, Occ Business, RIo 6-1_ 1 03/99, Padmaraonagai Hyderabdd.
2. K. Tirupathi !e.{dy, S/9 tate K. Sai Reddy, Occ: Business, R/o 18-1-259, Kandikal Gate Hyderabad.
3 5 S?t nelOy, S-/o late.K. Tirupathi Reddy, Occ: Business R/o 18_1-259, Kandikal Gate Hyderabad.
4. K Shankar Reddy, S/o late K. Tirupathi Reddy, Occ: Business R/o .,l8_1_259, Kandikal Gate Hyderabad.
5. K.^Raja Narasimha Reddy, s/o late K. Tirupathi Reddy, occ: Business R/o 1B- 'l-259, Kandikal Gate Hyderabad.
6. [.Pandurang1Red9.y, S/o late K. Tirupathi Reddy, Occ: Business Flro .tB_1_ 259, Kandikal Gate Hyderabad.
...Respondents/Defts
t.A. NO: 1 0F 2006(CCCAM P. NO: 6't3 OF 2006 Petition under order-39 Rure-1 & 2, Rrw. Section 151 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be preased to grant an as interim injunction restraining the responiients, their men, agents, person of persons claiming under them from alienating or dearing in any manner with the schedure of property and arso interfering with the petitioner's peaceful possession and enjoyment in respect if the schedule of property in os No. 519/01 on the file of the court of the X Addl. Cheif Judge, CCC, Hyderabad.
Counsel forthe Appellant : Sri. G K Deshpande (Not present) Counsel for the Respondent No. 3 : Sri Vinaykanth Reddy Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 1 to 6 : None Appeared The Court delivered the following:
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE LAXMI NARAYANA ALISHETTY C.C.C.A.No .225 oF 2006 JUDGMENT i (per the Hon'bte Si Justice Abhin(md Kumar Shauiti) None appeared for the appellant, though the appeal is listed today under the caption ,for dismissal,. Hence, this Court has no other option, except to dismiss the case for default and also for non_ prosecution
2. Accordingly, the Appeal is dismissed for default as well as for non-prosecution. No costs.
3.
As a sequel, miscellaleous applications pending if any in this appeal, shall stand closed.
Sd/. M. RAMANA KRISHNA DEPUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// \ ]l CTION OFFICER To,
1. The X Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad. (With records )
2. One CC to Sri. G K Deshpande, Advocate [OPUC]
3. One CC to Sri Vinaykanth Reddy, Advocate IOPUCI
4. Two CD Copies DL/dh @_*,
/I HIGH COURT DATED:31 11212024 rA $8, '6 k\c
JUDGMENT
) 2n25 i1 ttt TI 1 0 i.) CCCA.No.225 ot 2006 t oE pA-r APPEAL IS DISMISSED FORNON.PROSECUTION p "(