Smt Devarakonda Maheshwaramma v. Sri Pendota Rama Chary

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY ,THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE SHAMEEM AKTHER CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 2014 OF 2021 Petition Under Ar.ticle 227 of lhe Constitution of lndia against the order dated 05-10-2021 in O.S.(SR).No. 2763 of 2021 on the file of the Junior Civil Judge at Huzurabad, Karimnagar Dist.

Between:

Smt Devarakonda Maheshwaramma, W/o. Rajanandam, Age.65 years, Occ. House hold, R/o.H.No.8-6-192152, Kothirampur, Karimnagar District. ...PETITIONER/ Plaintiff AND

1. Sri Pendota Rama Chary, S/o. Venkata Chary, Age.62 years, Occ. Business, Rl/o.H.No.8-6J1 921 4l A, Kothtampur Karimnagar District.

2. Sri Chittimalla Swarajyam, S/o. Bixapathi, Age.60 years, Occ. House hold, Ryo. H.No. l -1 40, LIG-housing board colorfy, Karimnagar District.

3. Smt Naroju Krishnaveni, W/o. Venkata Chary, Age. Major, Occ. house hold, R/o. H.No.13-9/2, Pragati Nagar, Husnabad town and Mandal of Siddipet District

4. The Mandal Thasildhar, V-Saidapur, ViSaidapur manda, Karimnagar District. ...RESPONDENTS/ Defendants No. 1 to 4 lA NO: 1 OF 2021 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to register the suit returned on vide S.R.No.2763 of 2021 , dated 05.10.2021, pending l.A.No.6'1 5 of 2008 in O.S.No.538 of 1968 on the file of Hon'ble Senior Civil Judge, at Huzurabad, Karimnagar District to the orders by following the CRP. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI K. BUCHI BABU Counsel for the Respondents:

The Court made the following: ORDER

THE H( IN'BLE DT. JUSTICE SHAMEEM AKTI.IETT CIVIL TEVISION PETITION NO.2O14 OF 2021 1BDEB:

This revisi )n petition, under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, is filed b1 the petitioner aggrieved by the return of plaint in O.S.(SR).No.27(3 of 2O2l by the Court of Principal iunior Civil Judge, Huzurabi d, Karimnagar District.

2.

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the record.

3.

As seen fr rm the material placed on record, the Court below returned the su >ject plaint on 05.10.2021 with certain objections. Thereafter, the )etitioner did not resubmit the subject olaint before the Court belov " The petitioner ought to have resubmitted the subject plaint b:fore the Court below and made subrnissions with regard to the m, rintainability of the same. Without adVerting to the same, the pres( nt r:evision petition is filed. In view 'lf the same, the proper cour se available to the petitioner is to resubmit the subject plaint b 3Fore the Court below with a request to call the matter on ber ch and get adjudication with reqarcj to the maintainability t f the subject plaint, by way of an order on judicial side.

4.

With the :bove observations, the Civil Revision Petition is disposed of.

I

Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in this Civil Revision Petition shall stand closed. There shall be no order as to costs. i Note: Registry is directed to return the original plaint to the petitioner or her counsel on prope r identification and under proper acknowledgment, as per the proced u re, SD/-K.VENKAIAH ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// .t'

SECTION OFFICER To,

1. The Principal Junior Civil Judge, Huzuraba$ Karimnagar Dist' . . i: i'r'; h;gi"ir;r Judiciat , nigh C_ourt tor the State of Telingana atHyderabad. 5: iii; S.o'. c.R.P. Section, HIgh Gourt for the State of Telangana at -' iri"-r"uaa to complv wittr ihe direction fo the Hon'ble Court'

4. iil;'b ii1:'5"cti;;''offGr, ER section, Hish court to complv with the airlition of the Hon'ble Court.

s. o;; ca io sni. x. eucFlt BABU, Advocate'[oPUC]

6. Two CD CoPies

7. One Spare GoPY KUL TR df ]

HIGH COURT DATED:31 11212)21 j"a1T\- I ?

't'i.

,{'

\

ORDER

CRP.No.2014 o12021 2 0 .liili2il22 DISPOSING OF THE CR ? WITTHOUT COSTS f ,/:;'

,rt 4