Khaja Moizuddin v. Sri Sailoo
This judgment came from a scanned document and its text layer is unreliable — words may be garbled. Check the original PDF before relying on any passage.
,._*;rr_"---_:- [ 348s ]
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY,THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF DECEIUBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUDDALA CHALAPATHI RAO coN NO: 673 OF 2014 Contempt case filed under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act to punish the respondents herein for willful, disobedience of the orders of the High Court dated 27.01.2014 passed in Wp No.25g75 of 2013. Between:
[!rtq Moizuddin, S/o.Late t\rohd Hafeez. Aged 50 years, occ Advocate, R/o.H.no.4-2-144t1, Rajampet, sangareddy, Mlnicipality, tr/edak District.
...Petitioner
AND sri sailoo, Municipal commissioner, sanga Reddy tvlunicipality, Medak District.
.,.Respondent lA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under order 1 Rule 10 R/w. 151 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of tre fetilion, the High Court may be pleased to permit the petitioner to implead Sri p.V.V.D.prasada Rao' Commissioner, Sanga Reddy Municipality, Medak District as respondent No. 2 in CC.No.673 of 2014 in Wp.No.25B75 of 2013. counsel for the Petitioner: sRt P.RAGHAVENDRA REDDY counsel for the Respondent: sRt N PRAVEEN KUMAR(SC FoR MC,TELANGANA) The Court made the following: ORDER
INTHEHIGHcoURTFoRTHESTATEoFTELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THE; HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE SUDDALA CHALAPATHI RAO DATE: 24.L2.2O25 co NO .673 0F t4 Betwee:e:
Khaja Moiztrddin Petitioner And II \ Respondents Sri Sailoo and another I I T !
ORD ER This Contempt Case is filed for willful disobedience of the interim crrder passed by this Court in W.P.No.25875 of 2013, dated 27.O1.2014.
- 2.
When the matter is taken up for hearing Ms.Sharvani Gudipati leartred counsel representing Sri Krishna Reddy Putta, learned Standing Counsel lor Sangareddy Muncipality, on instructic,ns, would submit that the officials of respondent would construct the drain culvert in front of house of the petitioner bearing l:Iouse No.4-2-l44lI, Rajampet of Sangareddy' Medak District and clear the drainage which is stagnated due to damage of the cul'/ert, as expeditiously as possible' 3.
As the main writ Petition is disposed of today by a separate<lrder,recordingthesaidsubmission'theContemptCase
'1 j I III i I is closed. However liberty is given to the petitioner to approach this Court in the event the cause of action still survives pursuant to the interim order passed by this Court.
Miscellaneous petitions, if anv, pending shail stand closed. SD/. N. SRIHARI DEPUTY REGISTRAR \ //TRUE COPY// OFFICER S To, l
1. "One CC to SRI P.RAGHAVENDRA REDDY, Advocate tOpUCl
2. Two cc to sRl N. PRAVEEN KUMAR (sc FoR MC,TELANGANA) Advocate loPUCl
3. Two CD Copies NVBiPS e .. ... .-._.--1... " -r. -. .:.-.--.- , .
It i HIGH COURT DATED i2411212A25 i t S ( ,r'f, 'c:-: 2 5 [[B lrtlfi
ORDER
t-..
n:
CC.No.6 73 of 2014 -R * CLOSINGi 1gE CONTEMPT CASE }A