J. Rama Rao Flat Owner'S Association v. Shri. Arvind Kumar Ias
This judgment came from a scanned document and its text layer is unreliable — words may be garbled. Check the original PDF before relying on any passage.
'a:lg '-:a ri],ffiql
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD i 'I FRIDAY, THE TWENTY NINTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.VINOD KUMAR CONT EMPT CASE NO: 25260F 2023 Contempt Case under Sections 10 lo 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 to Punish the Respondents for deliberately and willfully violating the Orders dated 15-12-2022 in W.P.No. 44980 ot 2022'
Between:
J. Rama Rao Flat Owner's Association, , Represente{by its President' -T Uri".'n'err;rl s/o Somaiah, Ad;;tv;;;t' ociupation: Buliness' F/o 1 1-205diztid,I nrhihio npartme"nii uuta Complex, Saroor Nasar' Hvderabad500035.
...Petitioner
AND
1. Shri. Arvind Kumar lAS, The Principal Secretary to the Government of ' ili;;r;;;;: Nirni"ipir Aorinistraticjn ano Urbari Development' Hvderabad500004
2. Shri D. Ronald Rose lAS, The Commissioner' GrA-a]er Hyderabad Municipal - Cd.poirti"", *ead office, Tank bund, Hyderabad-500004 ;ii
3. Smt Aruna Kumari Charan' (9154299601), The Deputy Commissioner' ' Oi"r'tir ivo*abid Municipal Corporation Circle No 5' Saroor Nagar' Hyderabad-500035
...Respondents
i$,si .1.r..
Counsel for the Petitioner : Sri. JELLA NAGARAJ Counsel for the Respondent No.1 : GP For MA&UD Counsel for the Respondent No.2&3: Sri. M. DURGA PRASAD, SC FOR GHMC The Court made the following: ORDER li .:," .
i ,ilu#*;* .FtrffiT, t6,''ffi+:i.
.i,l'.trr:
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE T. VINOD KUMAR CONTEMPT CASE No.2526 of 2023 ORDER:
This Contemltt Case is filed allegrng willful disobedience of the order of this Court, dt.15.12.2022 in Writ Petition No.44980 of 2022. 2.
Heard learnr:d counsel for the petitioner, Sri M.Durga Prasad, learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of respondcnts No 2 & 3, and perused the record.
3.
Counsel for petitioner submits that cluring the pendency of the present contempt case, the respondents-authorities have complied with the aforesaid order, and thus no further orders are requircd to be passed in lhis contcmpt case.
4.
Recording the above submissions, the Contempt Case is closed. No order as to costs.
5.
Consequently, miscellaneous petitions, pending if an1., shall stand closed.
SD/. CH.VENKATESWARTLU DEPUTY REGIST!.AR !, //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, One CC to Sri JELLA NAGARAJ, Advocate [OPUCI^ .^ o;; Ca io sri r,rr DURGA PRASAD, SC FoR GHMC [OUT] Li PSR Two CD Copies 'i;;";t';
+/,< G? tor M A b uD, t1igt" coual-'
uYD'@'of) J d$ I
HIGH COURT .)', i:
DATED:2911212023 fir -l '
It .; .1i6:
,'.. ,.: t ,,. \, (l'
11, _1 2 0 tlAH 202f o
ORDER
^+ * t Oes FATc,H CC.No.2526 of 2023 1.
1rffi ffi CLOSING THE CONTEMPT CASE WITHOUT COSTS.