B. Aishwarya Reddy, v. Central Board Of Secondary Education,
This judgment came from a scanned document and its text layer is unreliable — words may be garbled. Check the original PDF before relying on any passage.
[ 31661 HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (SPecial Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEMBER . _--_TWO THOUSAND AND TWENW FOUR PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.VINOD KUMAR WRIT PETITION NO: 18283 oF 2015 Between:
B. Aishwarva Reddy' D/o. B. Chandrasen Reddy, Age.18 vears, occ Student' R/o. 3-6 6 978/2 7, Ava nth i n a g a"r,' B ;i';;b"i h' tiio e"raoao'- 500 029' ...PETITIONER AND .l.CentralBoardofSecondaryEducation,Regional,ffice.NewNo.3.oldNo. 1630 A, 't Block, 16th MainvR-;l: il;; &UI W"'tt' chennai - 600 040' Rep' r;;"ii"'id6; bffi""t Email rochennai cbseAnic in 2 rhe convener. reransan;''piir""iij'iiijJ1."t ;;o Gntal colleges Management ;4"""#li:"J;*[,il]?.y#Y:['iH+:'i3ru1'"llRepbvitsRegistrar ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of lhe Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated 'n the affidavit filed therewith' the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ' Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus to direct the 1st respondent to allow the petitioner to remit the fee of Rs.
r.A. NO: 1 0F 201 5 MP. NO: 23655 oF 2015 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition' the High Court may be plaased to direct the 1st respondent to allow the petitioner to remit the fee of Rs'700/- for obtaining photocopy of the evaluated answer book for physics subject (code -042)' by l !
directing the 1st respondent to issue the photocopy of the evaruated answer book pending disposal of main writ petition Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI ARAVIND FOR SRI VTVEK JAIN Counsel for the Respondent No.1: SRI GADI pneVieN KUMAR, Dy. counserrortheRespondentNos.2-r:3t-'il[-ti3il=-Hhi[l[:'3" The Court made the following: ORDER :
t !
, i i t
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICB T. VINOD KUMAR WRIT PETITION No. 18283 of2015 @EB:
Sri Aravind, leamed counsel representing Sri Vivek Jain' leamed counsel lor petitioner appearing through Hybrid mode submits that the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive for consideration of the Court any further'
Recording same, this Writ Petition is closed as infructuous' No costs.
.5 As a sequel,. miscellaneous petitions pending if any shall SD'. P.PADM ASSISTT$f"-ET'EFRRX ,/ stand closed ,fTRUE COPY// TION OFFICER ; ffi ig"gtff l**\TI:'# :; ;3:;::
*R GEN ERAL' F To PSK.
PSK ,/
r'
HIGH COURT DATED:31 112t2024 $
ORDER
TIIE S 14 t r4 WP.No.18283 of 2015 (, t (i(, lt.
-l P41q1-1rr', | ..<:'/ :-/ l i i CLOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION AS INFRUCTUOUS WTHOUT COdrS / /.2 y' //, //