Rathod Mohan v. The State Of Telangana
This judgment came from a scanned document and its text layer is unreliable — words may be garbled. Check the original PDF before relying on any passage.
[ 32s9 ] HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E.V.VENUGOPAL WRIT PETITION NO:41043 OF 2022 Between:
Rathod Mohan, S/o. Late Ganapath, Aged about: 50 years, Occ: Mandal Surveyor, Sarangapur Mandal, Mandal, Adilabad District, TS.
Rl/o. Brahmeshwar Village, Marlaggonda ...PETITIONER AND
1. The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat, BRKR Bhavan, Hyderabad, T.S.
2. The District Collector, Nirmal District.
3. The Assistant Director, S and LR, Nirmal District, TS.
4. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Nirmal Division, Nirmal Town and Mandal, Nirmal District, TS.
5. The Tahsildar, Sarngapur Sarangapur Mandal, Nirmal District, TS. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Afticle 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or Direction, on more in the nature of a WRIT OF CERTIORARI, or any appropriate Writ, calling for the records leading of the illegal impugned Proceedings vide Procs No. Al /1025/2O22, daled. 1410912022 and quash the same, which was illegally passed by the 2nd respondent, and consequently direct the 2nd Respondent to reinstate the Petitioner in his duty in the interest of justice.
lA NO: 1 OF 2022 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay the impugned Proceedings vide Procs No. A1/1025, 2022, dated. 1410912022,
which was illegally passed by the 2nd respondent by directing to pay the full allowance in the interest of justice, pending disposal of the main Writ Petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI RAKESH JANGEM Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR SERVICES ll The Court made the following: ORDER I
__ - HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E.V.VENUGOPAL SIRIT PETITION No.41O43 of 2O22 ORDER:
Learned counsel for the petitioner has addressed a letter d,ated, 26.12.2022 to trre Registry requesting to post the matter under the caption "for withdrawal".
2.
In view of the letter submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs.
3.
Interlocutory applications, if any, pending in this writ petition, shall also stand dismissed as withdrawn. SD/- N.SRIHARI ASSISTANI REGISTRAR (lt SECTION OFFICER //TRUE COPY// \ To
1. Two CCs to GP FOR SERVICES ll, High Court for the State of Telangana, at Hyderabad. [OUT]
2. One CC to SRI RAKESH JANGEM, Advocate [OpUC]
3. Two CD Copies PSK.
SW -*-
HIGH COURT DATED:3011212022
ORDER
rrr sra}( WP.No.41043 of 2022 o 23 FtB ?08 2t) .l:+ o L) \ ,-;.- DISM!SSING THE WRIT PETITION AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS.
e*d*