P. P. Amarnath v. M/S. Margadarsi Chit Fund Pvt.Ltd., And 6 Others
This judgment came from a scanned document and its text layer is unreliable — words may be garbled. Check the original PDF before relying on any passage.
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY,THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA CIVIL REVISION PETITI ON NO:1148 OF 2016 Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, aggrieved by the orders passed in E.A.No.541 of 2015 in E.P.No. 329 of 2ot3 in o.s. No.782 of 2010, dated: 72-77-2075, on the file of the Hon'ble III senior Civil judge, city civil Court at Secunderabad.
Between:
P ?. Amarnath, S/o. Komaraiah, Aged about:58 years, Occupation: Service, R/o. H.No.Qtr.No.T2-767, Krishna Colony, Near Supei Bazar, Bho'opalpally, Warangal District, Presently R/o.T2-30-1, Krishna Colon1,, bhupalapally, Wirangai bisr.i.t. " ... pETr T I O N E IVPETITI ON E IVD E FEN D EN T AND !1/S- Margadarsi Chit Fund Pvt.Ltd., Regd, Office at 5-10_195, Fathemaidan Road, Hyderabad. Rep. by its General Malnager, Recovery Dept. Sri. A.Suryanarayana Raju l{{l.VTk1!a {g31a,-S1o-. lc-handraiah, aged about 48 years, Occ: Service, R/o. H.No. Qtr.No,SD-296, RK 8 Colony, Sriramfur, Adilabad District YfQ l"j"i& 9/o. G.Laxmaiah, aged about 58 years, Occ: Service, R/o. H.No.42_ 112 Maruthi Nagar, Mandamarri,ldilabad Diitrict. Yl9.nltu Narasaish, S/o. Pochaiah, aged about 58 years, Occ: Service, R/o. H.No. Qtr.No.
SA-54, RK 6 Colony, Sriiampur, Adil;bad District. i) Yl.l Y._C,5g{ha_Rao,S/o.Prakash Rao, aged about 58 years, Occ: Service, R/o. H.No.27-767 / 2, Hamaliwadda, Mancheryila, Adilabad-District. Yl.J V-rllyq-Sryar,S/o.Venkataiah, aged about 50 years, Occ: Service, R/o. H.No. 12-952, Reddy Colony, Manchelryala, Adilabad District. Yl Y.B N.urgyrl-u Raju,S/o.Picham Raju, aged about 60 years, Occ: Service, R/o. Plot No.11, Kamala Nagar Colony, Medipally, GhatkLsar.Manclal. (The Respondent No2 to 7 arc nof necessary parties to ihis petition) ...RESpONDENTS/DEFENDANTS/PETITTONERS I.A. NO:1 OF 201 6(CRPMP. NO: 1441 OF 2016) Petition under section 151 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affic-lavit filed in support of the-petition, irre Higt Court may be pleased to stay a further proceedings in Ep No. 329 of 201.3 in oE No.
zg2 of 2010, dated 12_11_2015 against this Petitioner/Judgement Debtor/ Defendant No. 6, on the files of the Hon'ble III Senior Civil Judge, City Civil Court at Secunderabad. Counsel for the Petitioner(s): SRI. B SHANKER Counsel for the Respondent No.1: SRI p DURGA PRASAD Counsel for the Respondent Nos.
/II THE HON'I LE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA CIVIL REVISION PETITIO N NO.1 i48 0F 2016 ORDER:
Learned c runsel for the petitioner submits that the Civil Revision Petition has become infructuous and it may be dismissed. Recording :he said submission, the Civil Revision petition is dismissed as infr :ctuous.
There she ll be no order as .to costs.
Miscellaneous -_':u-'\-yt applications, if a: ry, pending shall stand dismissed. SD/.I.NAGALAKSHMI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR t\t \""
/rrRUE coPY// ST.CTION OFFICER To,
1. The III Senior Civi fudge, City Civil Court, Secunderabad
2. One CC to Sri B S ranker Advocate [OPUC]
3. One CC to Sri P D trga Prasad, Aclvocate [OPLiCl .1. Tn,o CD Copies
5. One spare coPy CH TR"&--
HIGH COURT DATED:3ytt2/2tt2L
ORDER
CRP.No.11,48 of.20!6 :, j .:
ili- <^( - att 1,.
\)
1. . ':) CIVIL REVISION PETITION IS DISMISSED AS INFRUCTUOU S a4 /,iL