Smt. Mandali Auradha v. The State Of Telangana
This judgment came from a scanned document and its text layer is unreliable — words may be garbled. Check the original PDF before relying on any passage.
[ 3251 ]
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD MONDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SURENDER CRIMINAL APPEAL NO: 1098 OF 2024 Criminal Appeal filed under Section 415(2) (C) of BNSS against the Judgment dated 0910412021 passed in C.C.No.65 of 2013 on the file of the Court of the First Additional Special Judge for Trial of SPE and ACB Cases at Hyderabad. Between:
Smt. Mandali Auradha, Wo Mandali Sudarshan Goud, Age aboul 62 years. Occ- House-wife, R/o LlG463, Near Sivalayam Temple, KPHB Colony. Kukatpally, Hyderabad, Telangana - 500 072.
..AppellanUPetitioner AND The State of Telangana, Rep by Spl Public Prosecutor, Through lnspector of Police, Anti-Corruption Bureau, Central lnvestigation Unit, Hyderabad. ...RespodenUState lA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 5 of Limitation Act R/w Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to condone the delay of 1306 days in presenting the present Criminal Appeal in the interest of justice. J Counsel for the Appellant : Sri Devara Samhitha Counsel for the Respondent: The Special Public Proseuctor, ACB The Court delivered the following: Judgment
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SURENDER CRIMINAL APPEAL No.1O98 OF 2024 JUDGMENT:
1.
This appeal is fiIed by the appellant aggrieved by the judgment dated 09.04.2021 in C.C.No.65 of 2073, on the file of I Additional Special Judge for Trial of SPE & ACB I I Cases, Hyderabad.
I I 2.
Heard the learned counsel for the appellant and the learned Special Public Prosecutor for ACB.
3.
The appellant herein is the private party and wife .of the accused who was prosecuted for disproportionate l assets vide C.C.No.65 of 2O13. The accused was convicted for 3 years.
4.
The accused preferred Crl.A.No. 192 of 2O2l questioning his conviction.
5.
The present Appeal is liled by the 3.d party/wife of the accused questioning the confiscation of the properties in the impugned judgment dated O9.O4.2O21. The said grievance of the appellant can be agitated in Crl.A.No. 192 of 2021.
6.
Accordingly, the Criminal Appeal is closed granting liberty to the appellant herein/wife of the accused to prefer a petition in Crl.A.No.792 of 2O2l,liled by the accused. Sd/. T. SRINIVAS DEPUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// S CTION OFFICER To,
1. The First Additional Special JudgeforTrial ofSPE and ACB Cases at Hyderabad
2. The lnspector of Police, Anti-Corruption Bureau, Central lnvestigation Unit, Hyderabad
3. Two CCs to the Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telang'ana at Hyderabad [OUT]
4. One CC to Sri Devara Samhitha, Advocate [OPUC]
5. Two CD Copies ADI(ghl*
HIGH COURT DATED:3011212024 I
JUDGMENT
l4 ll T CRLA.No.1098 of 2024 I ot npn zffi c tl,I I ,cr l'-^.tr: t rEo t t I CLOSING THE CRLA @ W