Suresh Koyya v. Prasanna Kasini
This judgment came from a scanned document and its text layer is unreliable — words may be garbled. Check the original PDF before relying on any passage.
[ 348e ]
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
(Speciat Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P.SAM KOSHY AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUDDALA CHALAPATHI RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 34504 oF 2025 Between:
S.uresh Koyya,. S/o. Sayanna Age. 46_years, Occ. Software, No. 2-g2, Koratpally Village, Dichpalle fiilandat, Nizamabad District - 503175 ...PETITIONER AND Prasanna Kasini, D/o. Ramulu Kasini, Aged about 4.1 years, Occ. Employee, No.2-4-49, Basaveshvara Nagar, Sangareddy, Dist. Singareddy SO2OOI: '
[,4rudula Kasini, W/o. Vikranth Kasini, Aged about 41. years, Occ. Judiciat Enrployee, No. 2-4-49, Basaveshvara -Nagar, Sanga-reddy, Sangareddy District - 502001.
Vijay Baitha, S/o Laxmi Baitha, Aged about 41 Vears. Occ. Govt. No. 2-4-49. Basaveshvara Nagar, Sangareddy, Sangareddy 502001 Em ployee, District - ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High court may be pleased A. To issue an appropriate order or writ one more in the nature of certiorari to call for the records, set aside the Bailable Warrant dated 16/06/2025 and 2410912025 at preliminary notice stage under Section 144 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (corresponding to Section ,l .25 CrpC) and quash the Bailable warrant proceedings in M.C. No. .10 of 2O2S on the file of the Honourable l-Additional Judicial First-Class Magistrate, Sangareddy, and
-7 rssue appropriate direction to respondent No.2 and 3 t, not to interfere the judicial proce ed in gs.
B. Direct the appropriate authorities to cause an inquiry t,r take the disciplinary action against the Respondent No.2 and 3.
c. All cases involving the petitioner before r-Additional i dicial I\,4agistrate of First Class at Sangareddy M.C.No.10 of 2025, D',.C.No..1 1 of 2025. C.C.No.136 of 2023 and C.C No.599 of 2OZ4 may be rssigned to another J ud icial Off icer lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 cpc praying that in the circ rmstances stated in the affidavit filed in suoport of the petition, the High corrr. may be pleased to dispense with filing of certrfied copies of Baitable warrant c1t.ed 16t0612o25 and 2410912025 at prelimrnary notice stage under Section .1 44 of the Bhar atiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (corresponding to section 12s C.r )C) and, quash the Bailable warrant proceedings in M.c. No. 10 of 2025 on the ri : of the Honourable l-Additional Judicial First-Class Magistrate, Sangareddy.
lA NO: 2 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 cpc praying that in the cir; lmslances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High cour nay be preased to assign all cases invotving the petitioner before l-Additional .rr dicial Magistrate of First Class at Sangareddy M.C.No.i0 of 2025, D.V.C.No.1 1 (i 2025, C.C.No.136 of 2023 and c.c.No.599 of 2024 to Judiciar officer, pendinr iisposar of this writ petition.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI G. SUMANTH KUMAR Counsel for the Respondents: - The Court made the following: ORDER
.TIIIi IIONOUIIAI}LT, SI{I JT]S'I'ICF] P.S,ANT KOSIIY \\I) TtIE I IONOURz\IILE SRI JUS'l lCIt SUDDAI,A CIIALT\PATIII IIAO WRI'I PEI'ITION No.34504 of 2025 ORDlilt (p<'r llon ltlt Sn./trstt<L l'.\trn Kosh1,1 llcard Mr.G.Sunrautli Kuurar'. learned courlsel lbr the petitioncr ancl pcruscd the rccord 2.
'l'hc instant writ pctitiorl has been liled by the pctitioner sceking lor thc tirllou,ing relicl:s " a) 'I o issue an al)propnnte or-det ot rvrit ttnc tttore itt the nature of ('crliorari to call firr thc records, set aside tltc llrrilablc rvarrant rlatod 16.06.102,i aud 24.09.?-025 at prelrrninarl noticc stagc Ltutlct Sccttou l44 o1' Bharatilir Nagarik Sur.aksha Sanhita cortcsptrnding to Scctlon 125 Crl)C) and quash the Eeilablc u'arrattt pt'occcdiugs in MC.No.l0 of-2025 on thc llle ol'tlrr: [{on'blc lAdditionlrl Jtrclicral First Class Maqistrate. Saugarcdcly. atrd issLte appnrpriatc clirection to rcsprtndcnt No.2 and 3 kl not to irtterf'cre tlrc-ludicial proccedittgs. b) Dircct thc applop|iate atrthot'ilies [o ciru:j(r tln inquiry to take thc discipInary actiort agaittst the l{csporrtlent No.2 and ]. c) All cascs ilvolving the potitioncr befirre I-Additional Judicial Ivlagistratc of First Class at Sanuarcddy M.C.No.l0 of 2025, DVC.No. I I ol 2025, C.Cl.No.li6 of 2023 and C.C.No.599 of 2024 tnay' bc assignctl to anothcr Judicial Olhcer.
D. Pass such othcr orders rts this Hon'llle Couft may deem tlt and propcr in thc intcrcst ol'.iusticc."
t t 3.
Prima fitcir,. it appears that thc glicvance of thc l)etitiotler is tlre isstrance ol bailable warrants in M-C.No. l0 of 2025 on the file of I Additiorral .ludicial First Class N4agistrate, Sangareddy. nt the outset. $e are of the consiclered opinion that the nature of 't \
rclicl' sourlrl tbr is not one u'hiclr can []c entcrtai:t', cxcr-crsrttu crtr-aorclinurr iLrrisrliction Lrnrlcr' ;\r'trclc 22(r of thc ( r slittLt-iort o1 lnclia. \\ie rrlc also not irrclincil to crrtcl'tain the rvrit p,' tiorr lirr tht. :inrplc rcasorr thu{ a 1)erusal ol'lhc cairse titlc itscl l'uoL I i|creul tha{ llrc u'rit lras bccn lilccl pertainirru to tlie rlisputt:s i-r. \ (an I)r i\a1c intliritltral: ulto rtrrLrlcl rtot olhcrri,isc fall r ithin thc ur lrit ol State rrnclcr Articlc ll of thc Couslitution c'r f lnrlra. Sint - llrc tlrsputc lrisirrq or:l ol' a criurinal casc r.e .M.('.No.l0 of 2025. r Li petrlioucr shall hc at Iilrct-[.,,to avail otltcl irpplopriatc lcnrcclics .r rrrLric rrntlet llrc prrr,isiorrs o1 llharativa Nalt:rlik Srrra!<shu Sanlrita. - l ll .1. Ii.cserrrrrg right ol the pcriliouer tt; avail suclr ren, lr.
il'so. lrt plcasos. lhc pr-csen1 Wr-it l)ctitiorr starrls r-e-je,;ted as not r )lintainithlc No or-rlcl as ro cosls I\,,Iisce llarteous applications I)endinq, it au_r . shirll stattcl c losc(l SD/.C.
1. One CC to SRI G. SUMANTH KUIVAR, Advocate [OPU( ]
2. Two CD Copies i MP LS
HIGH COURT DATIlD:13/1112025 ' (: ,.'\ ;l ,/ //., /:.r ,' .) 0 i L;i ?0fr :- 'i i i:.,3 )l ].'i.,
ORDER
WP.No.14504 of 2025 REJECTING THE V1/ tIT PETITION AS NOT M/TINTAINABLE WI]"IOUT COSTS LI | _-.- lv\