Kanti Harish Kumar v. M.A. Hameed And Another
This judgment came from a scanned document and its text layer is unreliable — words may be garbled. Check the original PDF before relying on any passage.
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR
AT HYDTJRISBT#E OF TELANGANA THURSDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEIVBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENT'
PRESENT THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE G, SRI DEVI CIV LM ISCELLANEO US APPEAL NO: 1247 0F 2011 Appeal Under Section 30 of Workmen,s Compensation Act agalnst the Judgment/Decree in w.c. No.297 0f 2003 dated 03-09-2011 0n the fire of the court of the commissioner for wokmen's compensation and Deputy commissioner of Labour, at Nizamabad Between:
Kanti Harish Kumar, S/o Sailu, Occ_ Ex- Driver of Auto, R:/o. Chandrashekar Colony, Nizamabad.
'
...AppellanUAppellant AND
1. V,A,Hameed, S/o. Hafeez, Aged; lvlajor Owner of the Auto No. Ap 25 U 3385 R/o tt4alapally, Nizamabad.
(Rl- dismissed wide Court Order dated.l 1 .07 .2016)
2. National Insurnace Compa!y Limited, represented by its Branch N,4anager, Branch Office, B. Laxmiraj Complex, Jawahar Road,'Nizamabad, Nizariabad District.
... Res ponde nts/Opposite Parties Counsel for the Appellant: SRl. LAKKADI DAYAKER REDDY Counsel for the Respondent No.2: SMT M. BHASKARA LAKSHMI The Court made the following: JUDGMENT
HONOURABLE JUSTICE G' SRI DEVI MiSCE LLAN EOUS APP EAL NO,12 r+7 ()F 201 i C]IVIL {UDGMENT:
Pursuant to :1 st--Ltlcn-Icllr arrived :It bet\\ ccll thel partics' l1-tc r.,,li Ac1:rlat. Hlclerabacl, pi'tsscd thc follorving aru ilrd on tl7' 11'2020: i.
This C.NI A anses orLt ol the orct:r d:itt (1 u'l uu lu l l irl W.C.No.297 of 2OO3 NF ot-r the fiLe ol the Commissioner lor and DePutY Commissioner of Workmen's Compensatlon Labour, at Nizamabad'
The Commissioner lor compensation and Workmen's at Nizamabad in Deputy Commissioner of Labour W.C.No.297 ol 2003 NF has granled compensation ol' Rs.2.18.7 i3i - incitrdir-rg cosls :rncl Adt'ocale ir-c Aegriclerl bv tlte si'LicL orcler, lhe applicant prefcn'ed arL :'tilpciti I iclc C.\1.A.No. 1217 ol '2O\ \ ' Durirrg thc pcncletrcr ol trppc:'11 lrorlt 1ltc pi.rrlies halc' compromisecl Ilre ul'1ltt'r'
3. 'll'Le Appcil:,rllt,'ApplicatlI alotlg l ith hrs t'otttlsel Sri Ll.Pral<:lsl.r Rccldr. Acllocatc, has rcpresclrtt:rl bclot't Lllr: virtual Lok Aclalar through online ovt:r the link providccl b1 the High Court Legal Sen'ices Committee, High Courr for the State of Telangana.
,+. The Respondent No.2 - National Insurance Companr' Limrted, Smt' Sujatha K.Kuntar, Manager, has represented before the virtual Lok Aclalat through online over lhe Linl< proyiclccl b}'the High Court Legal Services Comrlittee' Higl-r Clourt lor the Siirte of Telangana'
st:r1cd lhtlt tllcr rcsoivccl lhe cltsprLlo BLrth Lhc p:trtics Ljll,,rr('(L lt'.it-r cilrllllt'tlttlisc.
'l lll'
irilriclrltlr iLItcl
Appeilan t/Applicant has senr cop,v of Aadhar card in prr,r.t. o1'l'ris ir:len trfica tion. The malter has been setrled amic;,1., bctrreen thc parties.
'J'he r\ppcllarrrtApplicant h:rs :rgreccl to ret:t:ir_c an :utloLrlr. ol' Rs.2.23.O00,, (Rtrpces Trvo laklts t\\_clttl thlr.t. Lltr)risl , , onh 1 rol':r r-d s liril ri.
.utcl i-irirl scltlcnl(.n1 al)ltr_i ir-orn rir bv thc Comntissionet, for- \\,or.l<rrcn.s :lntoLl11t :ru-arde d Corlpensatiot.t :rr-rd Deput]- Cornmiss joner o1. Laltour t,, \izamabarl.
l.
.\c.o.r1i.glr llr. irri..rci i,s ,t:,Lsscd for_ :rrr ii.toLl,i Rs 2 23.000r' (Rupecs Tri'o lakhs t\\'..t\ rhrec rrr.usi,,:,, onlt.) tou'ards fu11 and final settlement apart iion_r Lhc. amounl ar,r,arded by the Commissioner lor Workmen,s Compensation and Deputl. Commissioner of Labour ar r N izam abad.
8. Thc llespor.rdent No.2,/lnsurance Cclnpanr, has to clepos:t Lhc itri alclecl :1111t)Ltnt o1' Rs..1.23.0001 iRrrpce,s -i-t.o lai l\\'all\ tht ca tltousiincl onlr ) to\\:1rals 1'ull .,rnll I:rscttlement u jri-rin a peliod of t\\-o (2) n-rolrths 1l-onr thr.: rl, I o1' rt-'ccipt oi r:r-tp., of this :irr iLr-d aparl ll otn thc :uIoLtiti r.rl';ilcllcl irl titc Conrmissioncr lor \\'or-knrr_,n.
C)on.rpcnsation trr-irl DeltLttr Corlntissioner ol L:rltlrLtr li \izanrabacl, :rltor gir,rng clr-rc c:rcCit to t1"re :rri.roLlrl alr,-'lrrlr depositt'd. In the etcnt ol clciar,rlt or delar ir-r r.n:rkinq sL i deposit, Lhe amount par.:lblc sha11 carn' intcrcst ztt l2t)t,., alrnum from thc date ol delbult.
9. Upon such deposrt, the Appellant is at libertl- to \\'rlhdra.,l the entire amount.
I
I1.1. Il'. t€1-1ns ol lhc collll)rolllisc ilfrlvC(l tlt 1)cl\\rr('ll lllr 1)il1-ll!'s' tllis cirsc slancls clisilr'':'tcl oi'
I 1. The p.rrlies are inlormcd that lhe Court 1ec' il anr ' paicl l;r' nn1' of them before Io$'er Court shall be refunded' In view of the award dated 07.1 l '2O2O, passed by the Lok Adalat, Hyderabad, this Civil Misceilaneous Appeal is disposed of in terms ol the award.
N4isceilaneous applications. if any, pending shall stand ;cc] Sd/-I.NAGA LAKSHMI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR l^/'
SECTION OFFICER \ To,
1. The Commissioner for Wokmen's Compensation and Deputy Commissioner of Labour, at Nizamabad.
2, One CC to Sri Lakkadi Dayaker Reddy, Advocate [OpUC]
3. One CC to Smt [t/. Bhaskara Lakshmi, Advocate tOpUC]
4. Two CD Copies (Along with a copy of Lok Adalat Award) //TRUE COPY// h'\Y I
HIGH COURT GSDJ DA'IED:3111212020
JUDGMENT
s o Y CMA.No.'1247 of 2011 I I J,q|J 2021 P * n- .\^, I "/ DISPOSING OF THE C.M,A. IN TERMS OF THE AWARD rvt ai"{v
I BEFORE THE LOK ADALAT ( o r s a ni z e d ry ri'!i%tl.t I Srt}ltj 3, ". s c o m m i tte e Hish Courf for the stale of.Telangana) (undersection'8fr :ff tl:;zliziin;i';i*i:iti""a"t,1e87(centrarAct) CMA No. LZ47 of ZOLL (Befor.e the.Hon,ble High Court) Against the order in w.c. no. zsi oi-it'ii"Nr on the fire of the Commissioner for workm.en,s cornpens-atiilia Deputy Commissioner of Labour, at Nizamabad, at. SJ-S"piember, 2011) / Appella ntlApptica nt Ha rish K 34 years, umar, S/o. Sailu, Occ: Ex-Driver of aged Auto, ad ha nd rash eka r Colony, Nizamab Ka nti about R/o.C 1, Respondents/Opposite parties ameed, S/o.
wner of the u-3385, R/o abad M.A. H Occ: O AP-25 Nizam Hafeez, aged: tvlajor.
auto bearing No.
. lvla Iapally, //'
Respondent.. No.2
2. I Nat ional I nsu ra nce Company Ltd., represented by it,s Bra nch Branch Office, B- La xm rra] Jawa ha r Road, Nizamabad.
Dist: Nizamabad Manage r, Complex, li / ltl J{ j (R-1 dismissed vide t7-7 -2076) court order dated (No._of proceedings of the High Court Legal Services Committee: oRDER RoC No. 103S/HCLse/ZoZo, o_tua oc_ri_Jozo. i: Present::
Name of Chairman :Hon'ble Sri Justice p.Naveen Rao, Judge, High Court for the State oi Telangana :(1) Sri S.Surender Reddy, Advocate, High Court for the Siate of Telangana
(2) Smt.Nandita Guha, Advocate, High Court for the State of TelanganaT Social Worker Name of Members AWARD The above determination to case between the parties having been referred for the LOK ADALAT and the parties having compromised the case/matter. the following Award is passed in terms of the settlement This CMA arises out of the order dated O3-09_2011 in W.C,No.297 of 2003 NF on the file of the Commissioner fcr Workmen,s Compensation and Deputy Commissioner of Labour, at Nizamabad. 1.
/A'-../ N^.A; aLgr\*
The Commissioner for Workmen's Compensation and Deputy \ Commissioner of Labour at Nizamabad in W,C.No' 297 of 2003 NF has granted compensation of Rs. 2,18,713/- including costs and Advocate fee. Aggrieved by the said order, the applicant preferred an appeal vide C.M.A.No. 7247 of 2011. During the pendancy of appeal both the parties have compromised the matter.
The Appellant/Applicant along with his counsel Sri M.Prakash Reddy, Advocate, has represented before the virtual Lok Adalat through online over the link provided by the High Court Legal Services Committee, High Court for the State of Telangana. The Respondent No.2 - Natlonal Insurance Company Limited, Smt.Sujatha K.Kumar, Manager, has represented before the vitual Lok Adalat through online over the link provided by the High Court Legal Services Committee, High Court for the State of Telangana. Both the parties stated that they resolved the dispute amicably and entered into compromise. The Appellant/Applicant has sent copy of Aadhar card in proof of his identification. The matter has been settled amicably between the parties.
The Appella nt/Applica nt has agreed to receive an amount of Rs.2,23,000/- (Rupees Two lakhs twenty three thousand only) towards full and final settlement apart from the amount awarded by the Commissioner for Workmen's Compensation and Deputy Commissioner of Labour at Nizamabad.
Accordingly the award is passed for an amount of Rs.2,23,000/- (Rupees Two lakhs twenty three thousand only) towards full and final settlement apart from the amount awarded by the Commissioner for Workmen's Compensation and Deputy Commissioner of Labour at Nizamabad.
The Respondent No.2/Insurance Company has to deposit the awarded amount of Rs.2,23.000/- (Rupees Two lakhs twenty three thousand only) towards full and final settlement within a period of two (2) months from the date of receipt of copy of this award apart from the amount awarded by the Commissioner for Workmen's Compensation and Deputy Commissioner of Labour at Nizamabad, after glving due credit to the amount already deposited. In the event of default or delay in making such deposit, the amount payable shall carry inteiest at 12o/o per annIJJTI from the date of default. 8.
Upon such deposit, the Appellant is at liberty to withdraw the entire amount.
.$Y\r.
Xa^a"u}fi**"
In terms of the comprom stands disposed of.
lise arrived at between the parties, this case 1.0.
'/ 11.
The parties are informed tl berore rower court shali ,"t::i:ffi'"
ree, ir anv, paid by any or them 1d * \ -8 der-ra rance Co Li For Natl al t<,Ho;lL l s $a E€T€f??IiA ed Sigrrarll'
horis ella n licant an Res ondent nce Com ,2 Insura ella n licant Cou nsel for A \!a^*ta P Cha irma n Memb er Member r1- :i l ;\, , a, Date: 07-11-2020 lttct-i c.:t.rR.r ] LOK AC,,,Lr:.T , ,1'j,.
.s, iij t e (Sea I of om m ittee)