Karantodu Devu v. The State Of Telangana And 5 Others
This judgment came from a scanned document and its text layer is unreliable — words may be garbled. Check the original PDF before relying on any passage.
/.
[ 3168 ] HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN WRIT PETITION NO:45947 OF 2022 Between:
Karantodu Devu, S/o. Bheemya Naik, Occ. Agriculture, R/o Village, Gambhiraopet Mandal, Rajanna - Siricilla District Mustafanagar ...PETITIONER AND
1. The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad.
2. The District Collector, Rajanna - Siricilla District, Siricilla.
3. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Siricilla Division, Rajanna - Siricilla District
4. The Tahsildar, Gambhiraopet Mandal Rajanna Siricilla District 5- The Mandal Revenue lnspector, 0/o. the Tahsildar, Gambhiraopet Mandal, Rajanna - Siricilla District.
6. Ganta Ashok, S/o. G.Rajaiah, Occ. Business, R/o. H.No. 3-'l-24, Gambhiraopet. Karimnagar ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly, one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the 2nd and 4th respondents in not taking action as per the Assignment Rules and initiating the proceedings under the provisions of the Telangana Assigned Lands (Prohibition of Transfer) Act, 1977 by evicting the 6th respondent from the land of the petitioner and restore the possession of land to an extent of Ac.0-15 Gts. in Sy.No. 3131212, situated at Mustafanagar Vitlage, Gambhiraopet Mandal, Rajanna-Siricilla District to the petitioner, as illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional, against the principles of natural justice and in contrary to the provisions of the Telangana Assigned Lands (Prohibition of Transfers) Act, 1977 and the Rules made there under, in the interests of justice;
lA NO: 1 oF 2022 Petition under S ection 151 CPC praying that in the circunstances stated in the affidavit filed in s:pport of the petition, the High Court m.ty be pleased to direct the 4th respo ldent to initiate action by issuing notirr: u/s;. 4 of the Telangana Assigned l.ands (Prohibition of Transfer) Acl, 1977, pending disposal of Writ Petition;
Counsel for the Petiti rner: SRl. T RAMCHANDER RAO Counsel for the Resp cndent Nos 'l to 5: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the I cllowing: ORDER
HON'BI-E SRI .'I.]STICE K. LAKSHMAN WRIT PETITION No.45947 OF 2022 ORAL ORDER:
Mr. T. Ramchander Rao, leamed counsel for the petitioner, seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the present writ petition with a liberty to file fresh writ petition. He has also made an endorsement on the case file to that ellect The Writ Petition is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn.
However, there shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in the Writ Petition shall stand closed.
I SD/-A.V.S. PRASAD ASSISTANT REGISTRAR / It_rSECTION OFFICER //TRUE COPY// To,
1. One CC to SRl. T RAMCHANDER RAO Advocate [OPUCI
2. Two CCs to GP FOR REVENUE, High Court for the State of Telangana, Hyderabad. [OUT]
3. Two CD Copies
HIGH COURT KL, J F-I-A DATED: 30l1itl2022 .,1 ,F t.r\- <os
ORDER
WP.No.45941 of 2022 WP IS DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN OF WITHOU T COSTS