Achutha Raghunath v. The State Of Telangana
This judgment came from a scanned document and its text layer is unreliable — words may be garbled. Check the original PDF before relying on any passage.
[ 34131 HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY ,THE THIRTIETH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE LAXMI NARAYANA ALISHETTY wRlT PETITION NO: 36761 OF 2024 Between:
Achutha Raghunath, S/o. Vishwanthem,4ge 61.years, qcc. Senior J.ournalist ii/ i.'i. rl Jh -7-o j t', sroeaari, Beside Subedari -Post office Lane, Warangal Urban, Hanamkonda. Pin. 506001.
...PETITIONER AND
1. The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal secretary to Home Department, Oi.b.H.AmUedkar, -Secretariat Buildings, Saifabad, Hyderabad'
2. The Director General of Police, State of Telangana, Cyber Towers, Lakadikapool, HYderabad.
3. The Commissioner of Police, Warangal District.
4. The Station House Officer, subedari Police station, Hanmakonda District, Telangana State.
...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 ol the constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High court may be pf"ri"O to issue a writ order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of writ of Habeas corpus in non-producing the detenue or trace out the detenue by the 3rd and 4th respondents in pursuanie of the Complaints, dated .22.12.2024, 23.12.2024 as an illegal, ex-facie, arbitrary, discriminatory' unjust, unfair' whimsical, non-application of mind, unlawful, unconstitutional and in violation of Frinciples' of Naiural Justice and in violation of Article 14, 19 and 21 of the Constltution of lndia and also against the catena of judgments of this Horible Court ind an Apex Court and consequently, direct the 3rd and 4th respondents to ;;;;"
the detenu before this Hon,bte court in pursuance of the complaints dated. 22.12.2024, 23.12.2024, PS Subedari, Hanmakonda District, Telangana State forthwith
lA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 4th respondent to produce the record of action taken on complaints dated. 22.12.2024 and 23.12.2024 P.S. Subedari, Hanmakonda District, Telangana State, forthwith before this Hon'ble Court Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. PRABHAKAR CHIKKUDU Counsel for the Respondents: cP FOR HOME REP., FOR THE ADVOCATE GENERAL Counsel for the Detenu i.e, Smt SALAKA THUMMA: SRI TAKUR KIRAN SINGH The Court made the following: ORDER
/// THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHITIAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THD HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE LAXMI NARAYANA ALISHETTY Writ Petition No.3676L of 2024 ORDER : (per the Honbte Si Justbe Abhil:aa(1 Kuntar Stnuiri) This Writ petition is filed by the petitioner under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following reliel l...to issue a writ order or direction more p-articularly one in the narure of w.it of ir;;."'Co.p.r" rn non-producing the detenu or trace out the deten;e by lne S1d and 4rh respondents in pu.".ri.i.'oi ,n. comptaints d.ated, 22.i2.2o2c ani Ei.li.'io\o "" ". illegal ex-facie, arbitrarv. di scri m inator],,'r.1, ",, r1rt., whimsical, non-applicarion of mind. unlaw,ful, unconstitutional and in violation .f p.i;;i;i"" .i'nill*, {usticg and in viotation of Article r+,"is?i';i'li ,h"
Constitution of India and also "grr;;; irr."#"l'. ", judgments of this Honble Cor.t .,.ialn eil il;;a consequently direct the 3rd and +tr-r .""pl"JJ"i" t" produce the detenu betore this Honble Court in pursuance of the comnlainrs clatccl zz tz.z-oili''ana 23.12.2024, pS Subedari.. Hanmakonda Disrricl, Telangana State forthwirh and pass...., \ Heard Sri prabhakar Chikkudu, learned counsel for petitioner and the learned Government pleader representing learned Advocate General appearing for respondents and Sri Takur Kiran Singh, learned counsel appearing for detenu Smt. Salaka Thumma.
2.
I { 3.
When the matter is taken up for admission and hearing, learned Government pleader has produrced the
alleged detenu viz., Smt. Salaka before this Court and the detenu has informed this Court that she intends to stay with her parents.
4.
In vieu, of the submissions made by tt;le detenu, t]nis Court is of the view that the present petition cannot be entertained. Hou,ever, liberty is given to the detenue viz., Smt. Salaka, who is a married women, to stay at her own place i.e., with her parents.
5.
Accordingly, the Writ Petition is closed. No order as to costs.
6.
As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending if an-v, shall stand closed.
SD/- P.CH.NAGABHUSHAMBA ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// ECTION OFFICER To One CC to SRl. PRABHAKAR CHIKKUDU Advocate [OPUCI One CC to SRI TAKUR KIRAN SINGH Advocate IOPUC] Two CCs to ADVOCATE GENERAL , High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad. [OUT] Two CD Copies Z.
., KKS PSK i +'
HIGH COURT DATED:3011212024 rtl E STA i*t \ !ti ,,1 / 2$25 20 itB
ORDER
WP.No.36761 of 2024 CLOSING THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS )i x \g-t>