T. Srinivas v. The State Of Telangana
This judgment came from a scanned document and its text layer is unreliable — words may be garbled. Check the original PDF before relying on any passage.
[ 3168 ] HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY ,THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUST]CE K.LAKSHMAN WRIT PETITION NO: 36960 OF 2024 Between:
T.-Srinivas, S/o Late Sri T. Sathaiah, Aged 60 years, Occ. Auto Driver, Rl/o H.No.3-2-4'1 , Bagh Ameeri, Kukatpally, tt-yOeraUdO. - ...PETITIONER AND The State of Telangana, Represented by its prl. Secretary, MA and UD Department, Secretraite, Hyderabad.
Boddupal Municipal Corporation, Bodupal, Hyderabad, Rep. by its uommrsstoner.
3. Smt. Vasireddy Vani, W/o V.Na Housewife, Rio M.No. 16-3-46/1 072.
gelwqra Rao, Aged about 50 years, Occ.
B, 763, Vasantn-gar, Kukatpa-lly, Hyderabad - ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High - cJurt may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more pariicularly one in the nature of a writ of Mandamus declaring the in actions of the 2nd respondent without considering the representation of the petitioner dated 16.12.2024 in not taking necessary and proper action of raising compound wall with sheets and further contemplating to raise structures by the 3rd respondent without being there in any proper sanction or permission from the 2nd respondent in open lani to an extent of the land admeasuring Ac.0.06 gnts., or equivalent 726. Sq. yds. in sy.No. 292lpart, situated.
at Mailampet Viirage, eutubuilapur Mandar,'Dundigar Municipality, Ivledchar - Malkajgiri District, and consequenfly not grant a"ny permission or sanction for constructions to the 3rd respondent lA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under section 151 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to restrain the 2nd respondent from carrying illegal activities and unauthorized constructions in land admeasuring Ac.0.06 gnts., or equivalent 726. Sq. yds.
Sy'No' 292lpart, situated.at Marampet Virage, Quthburapur Mandar, Dundigar Municipality, Medchar - Markajgiri oirtri.t ,n"J'ri sanction any permission for construction to the 3rd respondent pending disposa-r'or the Main petition Counsel for the petitioner: SRl. V V RAMANA Counsel for the Respondent No.1: Gp FOR MCPL ADMN URBAN DEV Counsel for the Respondent No.2: SRt 'UTTA KRTSHNA REDD' SC FOR MC Counsel for the Respondent no.3: _-_ The Court made the following: ORDER
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K. LAKSHMAN 1VRIT PETITION No.3696O of 2024 ORDER:
After arguing for some time Sri V.V.Ramana, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the present writ petition with a liberty to file fresh writ petition describing respondent No.2 properly. He haq also made endorsement to the said effect on the bundle. 2.
Permission is accorded.
3. Granting tiberty as sought, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, the miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in the Writ Petition shall stand closed. _-rl SD/.P. CH. NAGABHU SHAMBA SI TANT REGISTRAR I //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To,
1. One CC to SRI V V RAMANA Advocate IOPUCI . One CC to SRI PUTTA KRISHNA REDDY SC FOR MC [OPUC] . Two CCs to GP FOR frlCpl AOUU URBAN DEV 'High Court for the State of I Telangana. [OUT] Two CD CoPies KKS BS - /
?'
HIGH COURT DATED:31 11212024 ';:,-i;h o !) 18 pra nyq I 'a \i-,, \ ,-.
ORDER
WP.No.36960 of 2024 DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS //Z ;7ir