Vallapu Reddy Shekar Reddy, v. The State Of Telangana,
This judgment came from a scanned document and its text layer is unreliable — words may be garbled. Check the original PDF before relying on any passage.
I t 3302I HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY,THE THIRTIETH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K. SARATH WRIT PETITION NO: 35421 0F 2018 Between:
Vallap^u Reddy Shekar Reddy, S/o. Subhan Reddy, Aged about 55 years, Occ- Business, R/O. H.No.16-2-7OO|B, Anand Nagir, lr/alakpet, Hydeiabad, Telangana ...PETITIONER AND '1 The State of Telangana, Rep.by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad.
2. The Joint Collector-ll, Ranga Reddy District, At 177, Khairlabad Hyderabad.
3. fF Spelial Grade Deputy Coitector, and Revenue Diviaionat Officer, Chevella Division, RR Districf, TS.
4. The Tahsildar, Moinabad Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, TS.
5. J_qlneela Banu, W/o. Shaikh lmaml Aged - 7i years, Occ- Household, R/O. H. No. 8-2-579lB, Road No.8, Banjara ftitts, HyOeranaa. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ or direction, more particularly a writ in the nature of Mandamus to declare the order d1.O4.O7.2014 passed by the 2nd respondent in proceedings No.D1l851/20'12 and order dt.22.OS.2O1O passed by the 3'd respondent in proceedings No. Cl4S62l200B is illegal, arbitrary and u nconstitutional and consequently to set aside the order dt.04.07.2014 passed by the 2nd respondent, which confirmed the order dt.Zz.Os.2O1O passed by the 3rd respondent in proceedings No. C/4562/2008 lA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under section 151 cPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to issue interim directions to the respondent Nos.3 and 4 not to change the entries
in the revenue records in respect of the schedule property i.e., land admeasuring an extent of Ac.3.32 Gts., Sy.No.500/E situated at Kanakamamidi Village, Moinabad Mandal, Ranga Reddy District an pending disposal of writ petition Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. RAJAGOPALLAVAN TAYI Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 1to4: GP FOR REVENUE Counsel for the Respondent No.5:- The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.SARATH WRIT PETITION No.35421 OF 2018 ORDER:
'iodil.y, w'trcn t-lr<-' nratlcr- is Lal<cn Llp for hearing, learned counscl appearing lbr thc pclitioncr submits that cause of action dot:s nol survive and no furthcr ordcrs rcquireci. to bc passed in this mattcr.
2. Accorciingiy, recordit'tg il-rc alorcmcntioned submissions, thc) \,V ri 1 l)i:tilion is close d. No order as to costs.
3. Misceliancous pctiLious, if any, pending shali slanci cittscd.
SD/.K. SREE RAMA MURTHY ASSISTANT REGISTRAR I //TRUE COPY/i SECTION OFFICER To,
1. One CC to SRl. RAJAGOPALLAVAN TAYI, Advocate [OPUC]
2. Two CCs to GP FOR REVENUE ,High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad [OUT]
3. Two CD Copies BM BS
HIGH COURT DATED:3011212024 gE ST41 '\ e ( 1 / rrB 2025 z U t)
ORDER
WP.No.35421 ot 2018 So,/t,/<-S CLOSING THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUTCOSTS