Tulasinagar Residents Welfare Association, v. The Government Of Andhra Pradesh-

HIGH COURT FOR THE SI r"il o i 615,;'j l,lfjif,flf Ar HvDERABAD FRIDAY, THE THIR ,wo r,,o jdllsTil myEflffscErv8 E R PRESENT THE HON,BLE DT. JUSTICE SHAMEEM AKTHER wRtTPETfTlON No: 150 280F 2014 Between:

Tulasinagar Residents Wr *iq*iit*{[i:6_ifu i;{*i}fl $,$[i$nd,":ry#i{?#i}Li* ...PETITIONER AND

1. The Government of Anr norini-ri,itlii'i:'d;;#l11',1iJ3?,r",ii'a.Rep bv its Principal secretary' Municipar

2. The District Collector, Ranga Reddy District

3. The Greater Hvderabad .of .Municipal Corporation, Rep. by its A/unicipal Commissioner, CtilttC, HyOerab;; -''-' vvrvvrqrr 4' smt A.Jhansi. w/o sri A.phanindra, prot No.50, H.No.2-23-s22tB, Turasi Nagar, HMT Hiils, Kukatpaily, uvoeraOJJ_sbo olb' '" ""' ' ' ' M/s. lntus Towers Ltd., Rep.

Nelson Crescent Road, Vasavnt by Ku its^,Managing Direclor. Aravali Crescent,l, nJ, Phase ll, New Delhi 110 070.

,,.RESPONDENTS Petition under Articre 226 0f the constitution of rndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired therewith, the High court may be preased to issue an order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of lvandamus declaring the action of the Respondents No.2 & 3 in granting permission to the 5th Respondent for erection of Roof rop Tower(RTT) on the buirding of 4th Respondent in the residential area without following objections from the public, and the petitioner, there by causing damage to the hearth of the pubric residing, which is arbitrary, bad and illegal and violation of Article-14 and Article-21 of the constitution of lndia, consequently direct the Respondents No's 2 & 3 not to allow the sth Respondent for erection of Roof rop Tower(RTT) on the building of 4th Respondent situated at plot No.50, H.No.2-23-52218, Tulasi Nagar, HIVT Hiils, Kukatpaily, Hyderabad-500072 in the interest of justice

WPMP. NO:1 8623 OF 2014 II petition under section 151 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition' the High Court may be pleased to Direct theRespondentsNo's2&3nottoallowtheSthRespondentforerectionofRoofTop Towe(RTT)onthebuildingof4thRespondentsituatedatPlotNo.50,H.No.2-23S22lE,TulasiNagar'HMTHi|ls'Kukatpally,Hyderabad-soo0T2intheinterestof justice Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI S. M. SUBHAN Counsel for the Respondent No.1: GP FOR MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT Counsel for the Respondent No.2: GP FOR REVENUE Counsel for the Respondent N6.3: SR! SAMPATH PRABHAKAR REDDY, S.C. FOR GHMC Counsel for the Respondent Nos.4 & 5: Mr. MOHD ISLAMUDDIN ANSARI The Couft made the following: ORDER

I THE HON,BLE DT, JUSTICE SHAMEEM AKTHER P

ORDER

Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the subject matter oF this Writ Petition has become infructuous. Recording the said submission, the Writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.

Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this Writ petition shall stand closed. There shall be no order as to costs. SD/-K.SAILESHI ASSISTANT REGISTRAP lrr_,, SECTION OFFICER To,

1. One CC to SRI S. tV. SUBHAN, Advocate [OPUC]

2. Two CCs to GP for Municipal Administration and Urban Development, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad. [OUT]

3. Two CCs to GP for Revenue, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad. [OUT]

4. One CC to Sri Sampath Prabhakar Reddy, S.C. for GHlt4C [OPUC]

5. One CC to tr/lr. MOHD ISLAI\4UDDIN ANSARI, Advocate IOPUC] /irRUE COPY// t

6. Two CD Copies.

7. One Spare Copy.

*r{

HIGH COURT i DATED:31 11'212021

ORDER

WP.No.15028 of 2014 oF 'l L s'

uu)"

Cr'

\"

.:

/ o u, I )'1 .lratrl + DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS