Ravulapalli Ajay Kumar v. The State Of Ap
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEMBER, TWO THOUSAND AND THIRTEEN PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE: R. KANTHA RAO CRL.P. No. 15295 of 2013 Between:
1. Ravulapalli Ajay Kumar S/o Venkatramnarsaiah
2. Koyyada Venkataiah S/o Narsingam
3. Manda Narsaiah S/o Rajaiah
4. Bommagani Veeralakshmi W/o Kommalu
5. Koyyada Rajesh S/o Venkanna
6. Puli Naveen S/o Narsaiah
7. Pull Prasad S/o Narsaiah
8. Thota Tirupathi S/o Buchiramulu
9. Puli Rajitha W/o Prasad
10. Koyyada Venkanna S/o Veeraiah
11. Udugula Balakrishna S/o Upender
12. Erram Kavitha W/o Mahender
13. Thota Yekambaram W/o Durgaiah Petitioners(Accused Nos. 3 to 6, 8 to 10, 13, 16 to 20 (in Crime No. 120 of 2012 on the file of Chennaraopet P.S., Warangal District.) AND The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its S.H.O., P.S. Chennaraopet, Warangal District, rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P., Hyderabad.
Respondent/Complainant COUNSEL FOR THE PETITIONERS: Sri D. Y.N. L. N.Charyulu COUNSEL FOR THE RESPONDENT : The Additional Public Prosecutor Petition under Section 438 of Cr.P.C., praying that in the circumstances stated in the petition and grounds filed herein, the High Court may be pleased to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners with a direction to release them on bail in the event of their arrest relating to the Crime No. 120 of 2012, dated 20.10.2012 on the file of the P.S. Chennaraopet, Warangal District.
(Contd.
2. )
. 2 .
ORDER:
"This criminal petition is filed by the petitioners-accused under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking anticipatory bail in Crime No.120 of 2012 of Chennaraopet Police Station, Warangal District, registered for the offence punishable under Sections 420, 468 and 471 of IPC.
2.
Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners - accused 3 to 6, 8 to 10, 13, 16 to 20 and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor representing the respondent-state.
3. It is alleged against the petitioners and several other agriculturists that they obtained loans by producing false pattadar passbooks and title deeds. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the revenue officials processed the loan applications and the petitioners by themselves did not produce any documents for the purpose of obtaining loans issued by the revenue authorities. The learned counsel would submit that the petitioners have repaid the loans borrowed by them. In view of the above, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners.
4. In the result, the Criminal Petition is allowed and the petitioners -A3 to A6, A8 to A10, A13, A16 to A20 are therefore directed to surrender before the Station House Officer, Chennaraopet Police Station, Warangal District, within twenty days from today and thereafter, they shall be released on bail on their executing personal bonds for a sum of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees ten thousand only) each with two sureties for the like sum each to the satisfaction of the said SHO. "
Sd/- P.V.
Suryanarayana ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// for ASSISTANT REGISTRAR To
1. The Junior Civil Judge, Narsampet, 2.
The Station House Officer, Chennaraopet Police Station, Warangal District
3. Two CCs to Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P., Hyderabad. (OUT)
4. One CC to Sri. D.Y. N. L. N. Charyulu, Advocate (OPUC)
5. One Spare copy BV HIGH COURT RKR.J DATED: 31-12-2013
ANTICIPATORY BAIL CRL.P.NO.15295 OF 2013 GRANTING BAIL IN THE EVENT OF ARREST DRAFTED: BY BV DATED : 02-01-2014 HIGH COURT
RKR.J DATED: 31-12-2013 ANTICIPATORY BAIL CRL.P.NO.15295 OF 2013 GRANTING BAIL IN THE EVENT OF ARREST