Vadthyavat Harshavardhan Nayak @ Harsha v. The State Of Telangana
This judgment came from a scanned document and its text layer is unreliable — words may be garbled. Check the original PDF before relying on any passage.
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
WEDNESDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENry FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE K. SUJANA CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 17696 OF 2025 Between:
Vadthvavat Harshavardhan Nayak @ Harsha, S/o Meghya Nayak, aged about 25 veirs. Occ Auto driver, R/o Kanakapur Thanda Village, Moosapet Manoal' fr,tifriUr6nrg", District, Telangana Stdte, represented by^his.father.MeSryS Navak S/o Vadthavath boiva Naik aged about 44 years, Occ Auto driver, Rlo Girxaprr Thanda Villdle, Moosapet Mandai, Mahabubnagar District, Telangana State ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED No. 1 8.
AND The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Public Prosecutor, Hig-h Court at Hvo"rioro tn,oJgn"striion ilouse Officer, Station House fficer, Bijnepally P6lice Station, Nagarkurnool District ...RESPONDENT/DE.FACTO COMPLAINANT Petition under section 482 of BNSS praying that in the CircLlrnstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of criminal Petition, the High couft may be pleased to grant anticipatory bail to the Petitioner/Ac6gsed in the event of his arrest in FIR N;.10 of 2025 U/s 318(4) BNS and Section 66 (D) of lT Act-2008 on ine rite ot Bijnapally poiice Station, Nagarkurnool District, in the interest of justice This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the MemoraMum of Grounds of criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of sri G BANDAIAH ,Advocate for the Petitioner and sri. GANESH, the Additional Public Prosecutor (TG) on behalf of lhe Sole Respondent t The Court made the following: ORDER l
IN TIIE IIIGII COI'RT FOR TIIE STATE OF. TI I,,ANGANA AT IIYDERABAI) TIIE IIONOIIRABLE SUT. JUSTICE K. I UJA.ITA NITo.17696 of :2 t25 DATE:3L.12.20.25 Between:
Vadthyavat Harshavardhan Nayak Petitione r 'rrccused No.lg AND The State of Telangana.
Through SHO, pS Bijnepally, Nagarkumool Dist . .r I:q !V its Public prosecutor, High Court at Hyderabad.
!
Respondent/ De-far r I Complainant ORDER:
Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks p,ermission to l withdraw the present Criminal petition Permission, as prayed for, is accorded.
3.
Accordingly, the Criminal petition is r ismissed as withdrawn.
As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pendinll f a-ny, shall stand closed.
Sd //TRUE COPY To rc3i ff,lYT.'J,tTll[ ;ECTION OFFICER t 1 I:3l i, fli*,:"Jl: 1,,"u: ffi lllii8n.,-,:..i'",, Magistr:rr ) of First Class at ra
2. The 2"d Addl. Judicial Fir , r[,,,tx,n#;*#:'j:ff:I;::ff#;TJ#l)e. ces,a,.n, II
,l
4. One CC to SRl. G BANDAIAH Advocate IOPUC]
5. Two CCs to PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad [OUTI.
6. Two CD Copies \ PK,/PR
HIGH COURT DATED:3111212025 ( CI oot z o 1 [rB 1|l2 ) )
ORDER
CRLP.No.17696 o12025 * * r) J CRIMINAL PEITITION lS DISMISSED / rS WITHDRAWN l(s tl4* .
!