Sri K.Venugopal, v. Velpula Narahari,

IN THE HIGH COURT FOI

er nIoPnlBhrE oF TELANGANA WEDNESDAY,THE TWEN rw o *rb u b'a*rv JI il#Ifi, P$l.i^?.

c E M B E R PRESENT THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE N,TUKARAMJI CONTE M PT APPEAL NO: 38 OF 2018 contempt Appear Under Section 1g of contempt of courts Act aggrieved by the order dated24-10-2018 in c.c. No. rssi'oJroi? on rhe fire of the High court. Between:

Sri K.Venugopal, Deputy Commissioner, District, TS.

GHMC, lValkajgiri Circte-17, IVatkaioiri. RR ...APPELLANT / RESPO"NDENT NO. 2 IN CC / RESPONDENT NO.3 IN WP AND 1 . Velpula Narahari, S/o.. V. pochaiah, Aged about 46 years, Occ private Job, H.No.10-5-781/1/A/r venkarnagal Tu-karamgate, r.r6w vtnr<iieswil'iJ,i.',pre, North Lalaguda, Secunderabad, TS.

,, iespondent ( petitioner / Writ petirioner)

2. Dr.B.Janardhan Reddy. lAS. Commissioner, Greater Hvderabad l\/unicioal Corporation,Hyderabad,TSl ...RESPONDENT(Respondenti,to.tin GC / Respondent No. 2in W.P. ) (Respondent No.2 is not necessary party in this apped) lA NO: 1 OF 2018 Application under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the accompanying affidavit, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the impugned order made in CC.MI591 oI 2017, pending disposal of the Contempt Appeal.

Counsel for the Appellant: THE ADDL.ADVOCATE GENERAL Counsel for Respondent No.1 : SRI CH. DHANAMJAYA The court&h vd4J the following: JUDGEMENT

THE HON'BL iTHE JUSTI Ri\ CH AND TI EHON'BLE JU CE N.

CONTEMPT No.38 of 2O18 JUDGMENT:

(Pe/ ti e Hon'bb tLe Chief Justice Satish' Chandra Sho.n a) Learned c runsel for the appellant has informed this Court that the order ( ated 21.O9.2016 passed in W'P'No'34306 of 2016 by the iearned S ingle Judge has already been complied'with' in the ligl I of the aforesaid, the order passed in C.C.No.i591 of 2017 is he eby set aside and the contempt appeal stands disposed of acc, rdingly.

Miscellanr ous petitions, if any, sha1l stand closed. There shall be no ordt r as to costs.

"'iB,"fH'S3,U+E=^'J //rRUE coPY// a To SECTION OFFTCER

1. Sri K.Venugopa The D-eputy commissioner,Greater Hyderabad Municioar corporation, Ma kajgiri Cict6-tt, M;i[;jgi;i, h-rns, Re,jjy D;ifti: " ,," "-

2. Dr B.Janardhar Reioy, le_s., c;ffii;3il;"; c;";i;; H]d;;;ta"i Muntcipar - Corporation, Hy, erabad', TS.

-'-"""

3 Two ccs to t6r Additionar Advocate Generar, High court for the state of Telangana at Hi lerabad. IOUi- --'-

4. One CC to SRt.- lH. DHANA[/jhyA, Advocate [OPUC]

5. Two CD Cooies

6. One Spare bopl ZBS

/'

HIGH COURT DATED:2911212021

JUDGMENT

1 dE $ i41 ( { CONTEMPT At'PEAL No.38 of 2018 1 I JAU 2022 li) ,-} ,.

FJi:..",1i- , rtt DISPOSINC OF THE C )NTEMPT APPEAL.

* t+ lo