Milton v. The Inspector Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Tuesday, the Thirtieth day of December Two Thousand Fourteen PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.MAHADEVAN CRL OP(MD) No.23773 of 2014 1 MILTON 2 K.S.CHANDRA SEKARAN 3 FATHIMA MARY 4 C.DANIEL 5 OPHILIA 6 LIZZY WINCENT ... PETITIONERS/ACCUSED RANK NOT KNOWN Vs THE STATE REP BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE WORRAIYUR POLICE STATION, TRICHY CITY.

CR. NO.714/2014. ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S.B.JAMEEL ARASU Advocate For Respondent : M/S.S.PRABHA, Government Advocate(Crl.side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence punishable under sections 147, 148, 294(b), 324 and 506(ii) IPC read with Section 3 of TNPPDL Act in Crime No.714 of 2014 on the file of the respondent police and seek anticipatory bail.

2.The case of the prosecution is that due to matrimonial dispute, the petitioners are said to have pelted stones on the house of the de facto complainant and caused damage to the mirror of the car.

3.Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners are the innocent persons and they have been falsely implicated in this case.

4.Learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) submitted that no one has sustained injury.

5.Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and the learned Government Advocate(Crl. Side) appearing for the state and also perused the entire materials available on record. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

6.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.IV, Trichy and on their executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioners shall appear before the respondent police, daily twice at 10.30 a.m. and 5.30 p.m. until further orders. The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously. 7.The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready failing which, the petitioner for anticipatory bail stands dismissed.

sd/- 30/12/2014 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, IV, TRICHY 2 -DO-THRO'THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE TRICHY DISTRICT 3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE WORRAIYUR POLICE STATION, TRICHY CITY. 4 THE ADDL.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

+1. CC to M/S.B.JAMEEL ARASU Advocate SR.No.69326

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.23773 of 2014 Date :30/12/2014 NA/31/12/2014/P2/6C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/