Manimuthu v. The Inspector Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Monday, the Twenty First day of December Two Thousand Fifteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice S.VAIDYANATHAN CRL OP(MD) No.24418 of 2015 1 MANIMUTHU 2 ADAIKALAM 3 AZHAGAR ... PETITIONERS/ACCUSED RANK NOT KNOWN Vs THE STATE THROUGH THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, KEERANUR, PUDUKKOTTAI DISTRICT.

CRIME NO. NOT KNOWN OF 2015 ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S P.GANAPATHI SUBRAMANIAN Advocate For Respondent : MR.K.ANBARASAN, Government Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners, who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent Police for the alleged offence punishable under Sections 494, 147, 148, 294(b) and 506(ii) of IPC, in Crime No.Not known of 2015 on the file of the respondent Police, seek anticipatory bail. 2.The case of the prosecution is that the first petitioner is the husband of the defacto complainant and he married another lady one Parvathy on 10.06.2015 and the same was question by the defacto complainant. At that time, the first petitioner abused the defacto complainant and threatened her with dire consequences. 3.Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) appearing for the respondent. 4.Considering the fact that, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, before the learned District Munsif-cum-Judicial Magistrate, Keeranur, on condition that the petitioners shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that:

[a] the petitioners shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 am for a period of two weeks and thereafter, as and when required for the purpose of interrogation.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

[b] the petitioners shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial.

[c] the petitioners shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.

[d] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioners in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioners released on bail by the learned Magistrate himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560].

5.The Inspector of Police concerned is directed to send compliance report to the office of the learned Additional Public Prosecutor whether the petitioners are complying with the order or not. 6.The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed. sd/- 21/12/2015 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO 1 THE DISTRICT MUNSIF CUM JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, KEERANUR. 2 DO THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE,PUDUKOTTAI DISTRICT. 3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE.ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION,KEERANUR, PUDUKKOTTAI DISTRICT.

4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECTUOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

+1. CC to M/S P.GANAPATHI SUBRAMANIAN Advocate SR.No.76165 CSL/MP-PM/SAR-I/23.12.2015 2P/6C

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.24418 of 2015 Date :21/12/2015 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/