T.Mohammed Bilaludeen @ Bilal v. The Inspector Of Police
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Thursday, the Twenty Eighth day of December Two Thousand Seventeen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice S.VAIDYANATHAN CRL OP(MD) No.17995 of 2017 1 T.MOHAMMED BILALUDEEN @ BILAL 2 T.SYED RAVIYA ... PETITIONERS/ACCUSED No.A2 and A4 Vs STATE THROUGH, THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, SIKKAL POLICE STATION, RAMANATHAPURAM.
IN CR.NO. 102/2017 ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioners : M/S.P.BALASUBRAMANIAN Advocate For Respondent : MR.K.ANBARASAN, Government Advocate(Crl.Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- Apprehending arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 294(b), 323 and 506 (i) IPC in Crime No.102 of 2017 on the file of the respondent police, the petitioners have come forward with this petition seeking anticipatory bail.
2.
Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) appearing for the respondent police.
3.
The case of the prosecution is that due to civil dispute, the petitioners along with the other accused have scolded the defacto complainant in filthy language and also attacked him with hands, which resulted in registration of the case. 4.
Learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case.
5. Learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) submitted that the injured has been discharged from the hospital and it is a case in counter.
6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and taking note of the fact that injured has been discharged from the hospital and also the fact that it is a case in counter, this Court is of the view that custodial interrogation of these petitioners is not necessary at this stage. Therefore, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners.
7.
Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of their arrest or appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, before the Judicial Magistrate, Mudukulathur, subject to the following conditions:
(i) each of the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the Magistrate concerned;
(ii) the petitioners shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m. for two weeks and thereafter as and when required for interrogation; (iii) the petitioners shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial; (iv) the petitioners shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.
(v) on breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005) AIR SCW 5560]. sd/- 28/12/2017 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.
TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, MUDUKULATHUR, 2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, RAMANATHAPURAM 3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, SIKKAL POLICE STATION, RAMANATHAPURAM.
4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI +1. CC to M/S.P.BALASUBRAMANIAN Advocate SR.No.37125
ORDER
IN CRL OP(MD) No.17995 of 2017 Date :28/12/2017 PK/CM/SAR-2/02.01.2018: 3P/6C