← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/835/2016rejected

Anusiya v. The Inspector Of Police

2016-03-17Honourable Mr Justice P. N. Prakash2 pages

This judgment came from a scanned document and its text layer is unreliable — words may be garbled. Check the original PDF before relying on any passage.

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Thursday, the Seventeenth day of March Two Thousand Sixteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice P.N.PRAKASH CRL OP(MD) Nos.835,839 and 840 of 2016 ANUSIYA ... PETITIONER/ACCUSED No.4 IN CRL OP(MD)NO.835 OF 2016.

J.DINESH KUMAR ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED No.1 IN CRL OP(MD)NO.839 OF 2016.

1 JAGANATHAN 2 VIJAYA LAKSHMI ...PETITIONERS/ACCUSED No.2 & 3 IN CRL OP(MD)NO.840 OF 2016.

Vs 1 THE STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION-FORT, TRICHY, CRIME NO NOT KNOWN OF 2015.

... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT IN ALL THE PETITIONS 2 P. DIVYA BHARATHI ... 2ND RESPONDENT/DEFACTO COMPLAINANT IN ALL THE PETITIONS For Petitioners : M/S M.R.SREENIVASAN Advocate in all the Petitions For 1st Respondent : M/S.A.P. BALASUBRAMANI,Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side)in all the Petitions.

PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners, who apprehended arrest at the hands of the respondent Police for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 294(b), 498(A), 506(i) I.P.C., and Sections 3 and 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act, in Crime No.Not Known of 2015, on the file of the first respondent Police, seek anticipatory bail.

2. Heard Mr.M.R.Sreenivasan, learned counsel appearing for the https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ petitioners and Mr.A.P.Balasubramani, learned Government Advocate

(Criminal Side) appearing for the first respondent.

3. It is seen that on 19.01.2016, when these criminal original petitions came up for hearing, it was represented by the learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) that petition enquiry was pending and hence this Court granted interim anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

4. Today, when these criminal original petitions are taken up for hearing, the learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) has submitted that the complaint lodged by the de facto complainant has been closed after conducting enquiry.

5. In view of the submission of the learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side), these criminal original petitions are closed. sd/- 17/03/2016 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO 1 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION-FORT, TRICHY.

2 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

+3. CC to M/S M.R.SREENIVASAN Advocate SR.No.15134,15133,15132.

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.835,839 and 840 of 2016 Date :17/03/2016 AM/GSV.PM/AR-I/21.03.2016/2P/6C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/