Mohamed Ibrahim v. The Sub - Inspector Of Police
This judgment came from a scanned document and its text layer is unreliable — words may be garbled. Check the original PDF before relying on any passage.
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 18.12.2013
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.SATHYANARAYANAN Criminal Original Petition (MD) No.21341 of 2013 Mohamed Ibrahim ... Petitioner/Sole Accused Vs 1.State, rep.by The Sub Inspector of Police Tanjore Town East Police Station Tanjore District (Crime No.718 of 2013) 2.Abdul Rahim ... Respondents PRAYER: This petition is preferred under Section 482 Cr.P.C to call for the records pertaining to the first information report in Crime No.718 of 2013, on the file of the first respondent Police and to quash the same. For Petitioner : Mr.C.M.Arumugam For Respondents : Mr.P.Kandasamy Govt.Advocate (Crl.Side) for R1 Mr.A.Saravanan for M/s.Perfect Law Associates for R2
O R D E R
The sole accused in Crime No.718 of 2013, on the file of the first respondent Police, has filed this criminal original petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C., to quash the proceedings in Crime No.718 of 2013.
2. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner/accused would submit that the dispute arose between the petitioner/accused and the second respondent/de facto complainant has been settled amicably and to that effect they have also filed a joint memo of compromise dated 11.12.2013 and hence prayed for quashment of the said FIR.
3. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner/accused, learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the first respondent as well as the learned counsel appearing for the second respondent/de facto complainant and the learned counsel for the second respondent/de facto complainant would submit that the dispute arose between the petitioner and the de facto complainant has been settled amicably and hence this criminal original petition may be allowed and consequently the proceedings in Crime No.718 of 2013, against the petitioner/accused may be quashed.
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
4. The petitioner/accused as well as the second respondent/de facto complainant are present and they were identified by their respective learned counsels and they were also enquired and both of them are agreed that the dispute arose between them has been settled amicably. Learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) was also heard.
5. The joint memo of compromise dated 11.12.2013 is taken on file and placed it on record.
6. In the light of the same, this criminal original petition is allowed and the proceedings in Crime No.718 of 2013, on the file of the first respondent Police, against the petitioner/accused is quashed. Sd/- Assistant Registrar(Records) /True copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar krk To 1.The Sub Inspector of Police Tanjore Town East Police Station Tanjore District.
2.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.
Crl.O.P(MD).No.21341 of 2013 18.12.2013 rg.02.01.2014 2p/3c https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/