Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/22808/2013granted

Karthi v. The Inspector Of Police

2013-12-20Honourable Mr Justice M. Sathyanarayanan2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Friday, the Twentieth day of December Two Thousand Thirteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice M.SATHYANARAYANAN CRL OP(MD) No.22808 of 2013 1 KARTHI 2 ANAND 3 SANTHOSH 4 DEVA ..PETITIONERS/ACCUSED 1 TO 4 Vs.

STATE REP BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE PATTEESWARAM POLICE STATION, THANJAVUR DISTRICT.

CR.NO.236/2013 ..RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S.M.KARUNANITHI Advocate For Respondent : Mr.K.V.RAJARAJAN, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners, who are arrayed as A1 to A4, apprehending arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged commission of offences punishable under sections 294(b), 323 and 506(i) of I.P.C, said to have been committed on 10.12.2013, in Crime No.236 of 2013, on the file of the respondent police, seek anticipatory bail.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the accused said to have assaulted the de-facto complainant and due to that, the defacto complainant said to have sustained simple injury.

3. Learned Government Advocate(Crl. Side) submitted that the defacto complainant sustained simple injury and he was discharged from the hospital.

4. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) appearing for the State and perused the materials available on record.

5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioners on anticipatory bail. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Kumbakonam and on each of them executing a personal bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioners shall appear before the respondent police daily at 11.00 a.m. for a period of two weeks and thereafter as and when required for the purpose of interrogation. The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C., scrupulously. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

6. The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed. sd/- 20/12/2013 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, KUMBAKONAM, THANJAVUR DISTRICT. 2 -DO-THRO'THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, THANJAVUR AT KUMBAKONAM. 3 THE ADDL.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT,MADURAI. 4 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PATTEESWARAM POLICE STATION, THANJAVUR DISTRICT.

+1. CC to M/S.M.KARUNANITHI Advocate SR.No.63989 ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.22808 of 2013 Date :20/12/2013 PBK 27/12/2013 2P/6C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/