Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/23244/2013granted

S.Balamurugan v. The Inspector Of Police

2013-12-20Honourable Mr Justice M. Sathyanarayanan2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Friday, the Twentieth day of December Two Thousand Thirteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice M.SATHYANARAYANAN CRL OP(MD) No.23244 of 2013 1 S.BALAMURUGAN 2 B.USHABAI ... PETITIONERS/ACCUSED NOS.1 AND 2 Vs THE STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE CANTONMENT POLICE STATION, TRICHY CITY, CR.NO.1612/2013 ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S.G.THIRUVARUTSELVAN Advocate For Respondent : MR.K.V.RAJARAJAN, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners, who are arrayed as A1 and A2 in Crime No.1612 of 2013 on the file of the respondent police,, apprehending arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged commission of offences punishable under sections 294(b), 323 and 506(i) I.P.C., seek anticipatory bail.

2.Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) appearing for the State and also perused the entire materials available on record. 3.The learned Government Advocate (criminal side) would submit that this is a case of simple injury and further the petitioners are not having any bad antecedent.

4. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the fact that simple injury only caused by the petitioners, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioners on anticipatory bail.

5. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ in the event of their arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Srivaikundam, Thoothukudi District, and on each

executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the second petitioner shall appear before the respondent police daily at 11.00 a.m for a period of one week and thereafter as and when required for interrogation. Further, the first petitioner shall appear before the respondent Police as and when required for interrogation. The petitioners shall comply with the conditions stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C., scrupulously.

6. The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail would stand dismissed.

sd/- 20/12/2013 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, SRIVAIKUNDAM,TUTICORIN DT.

2 DO-THRO' THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, TUTICORIN.

3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, CANTONMENT POLICE STATION, TRICHY CITY.

THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT,MADURAI.

+1. CC to M/S.G.THIRUVARUTSELVAN Advocate SR.No.64025

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.23244 of 2013 Date :20/12/2013 PA/27.12.2013/2P/6C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/