B.Durai Pandi v. The Inspector Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Monday, the Thirtieth day of December Two Thousand Thirteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice P.N.PRAKASH CRL OP(MD) No.23563 of 2013 B.DURAI PANDI ..PETITIONER/ACCUSED (RANK NOT KNOWN) Vs.

STATE REP BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE KEELAVALAVU POLICE STATION, MADURAI DISTRICT.

CR. NO. NOT KNOWN OF 2013.

..RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S.K.J.ASSOCIATES Advocate For Respondent : Mr.A.P.BALASUBRAMANI, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged commission of offences punishable under sections 379 of I.P.C. read with Section 4(1) 4(2) and 21(1)(V) of the Mines and Mineral Development and Regulation Act, in Crime No.not known of 2013 on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail. 2.It is alleged by the petitioner that he is the owner of the vehicle bearing registration No.TN 59 BZ 4754 and TN 65 Z 0891, which is involved in the commission of offence on 22.12.2013 and the first information report was registered on the same day for the above said offences.

3.The learned Government Advocate (criminal side) would submit that the contraband has been seized and there is no previous case against the petitioner.

4. In the facts and circumstances of the case, since the petitioner is the owner of the vehicle and no previous case against him, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certain conditions.

5.Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail, in the event of arrest or on his appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Melur and on executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioner shall appear before the respondent police for a period of two weeks and thereafter as and when required for interrogation.

The petitioner shall comply with the conditions stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. Scrupulously. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

6. The petitioner shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed. sd/- 30/12/2013 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, MELUR, MADURAI DISTRICT. 2 -DO-THRO'THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, MADURAI. 3 THE ADDL.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT,MADURAI. 4 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE,KEELAVALAVU POLICE STATION, MADURAI DISTRICT. +1. CC to M/S.K.J.ASSOCIATES Advocate SR.No.15 ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.23563 of 2013 Date :30/12/2013 PBK 02/01/2014 2P/6C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/