Selvaraj v. The Inspector Of Police
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Monday, the Thirtieth day of December Two Thousand Thirteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice P.N.PRAKASH CRL OP(MD) No.23609 of 2013 1 SELVARAJ 2 PRABHA ..PETITIONERS/ACCUSED (RANK NOT KNOWN) Vs.
STTE REP BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE DISTRICT CRIME BRANCH, THENI.
(CRIME NO. NOT KNOWN/2013) ..RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S.P.SENGUTTUARASAN Advocate For Respondent : Mr.A.P.BALASUBRAMANI, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners, who are arrayed as accused, pray for the grant of anticipatory bail under Section 438 of Cr.P.C. for the alleged commission of offences punishable under Sections 406 and 420 I.P.C., in Crime No.Not Known of 2013, on the file of the respondent police.
2. In view of the endorsement made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn in respect of the first petitioner.
3. In respect of the second respondent/wife of the first petitioner, there are no overtacts alleged against her and she is a housewife.
4. Heard the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) on the above submissions.
5.Taking into consideration of the facts and circumstances, this Court is of the view that the second petitioner can be granted the relief of anticipatory bail and accordingly;
(a) In the event of arrest by or on appearance before the respondent police;
(b) In the event of appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Uthamapalayam, within 15 days from the date of receipt of copy of the order, (i) the second petitioner shall be enlarged on bail on executing a bond for Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only), with two sureties each for the like sum to their satisfaction;
(ii)the second petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the fact of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any Police Officer;
(iii) The second petitioner shall be available before the respondent Police for interrogation as and when required. sd/- 30/12/2013 / TRUE COPY / https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.)
TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, UTHAMAPALAYAM, THENI DISTRICT. 2 -DO-THRO;THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, THENI. 3 THE ADDL.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT,MADURAI. 4 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, DISTRICT CRIME BRANCH, THENI. +1. CC to M/S.P.SENGUTTUARASAN Advocate SR.No.4 ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.23609 of 2013 Date :30/12/2013 PBK 02/01/2014 2P/6C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/