Prince Lal @ Kannan v. The State Of Kerala
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.P.JYOTHINDRANATH TUESDAY, THE 29TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2015/8TH POUSHA, 1937 Bail Appl..No. 8231 of 2015 ------------------------------- CRIME NO. 2028/2015 OF HARIPAD POLICE STATION, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT. ..........
PETITIONER/1ST ACCUSED:
---------------------------------------- PRINCE LAL @ KANNAN, S/O.SHAJILAL MOHAN, AGED 31 YEARS, RESIDING AT THAICHIRA VEETTIL, KARUVATTA NORTH MURI, KARUVATTA VILLAGE, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT.
BY ADVS.SRI.T.MADHU SRI.B.S.SURAJ KRISHNA RESPONDENT/STATE:
-------------------------------- THE STATE OF KERALA, THROUGH THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, HARIPAD POLICE STATION, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT, REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM-682031.
BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.K.K.RAJEEV THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 29-12-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
mbr/
K.P. JYOTHINDRANATH, J.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 29th day of December, 2015
O R D E R
This is an application filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
2.
The petitioner is the first accused in crime No.2028/2015 of Haripad Police Station, Alappuzha District. 3.
When the petition came up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted before me that the allegation is that the petitioner had committed offences punishable under Sections 307, 202 and 120(b) r/w. Section 34 of IPC. It is the submission that even though the petitioner as well as the 2nd accused are arrested on 9.12.2015 the petitioner is not so far released by the trial court. It is the submission that the 2nd accused is already released on bail by this court as per order dated 18.12.2015. 4.
I perused the said bail order.
5.
After considering the totality of the case and also after going through the copy of FIR produced along with the bail application, I feel that the petitioner can be granted bail
on the very same condition on which the 2nd accused was granted bail:
1) The petitioner shall be released on bail on his executing a bond for Rs.50,000/- (Rupees fifty thousand only) with two solvent sureties each for the like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate having jurisdiction.
2) The sureties shall be the persons permanently residing in the State of Kerala and shall produce documents to establish their identity and solvency. 3) The lower court need not insist on solvency certificate. Other documents revealing the solvency of the sureties can also be relied on.
4) The petitioner shall appear before the Investigating Officer for interrogation on all Saturdays between 10.00 a.m. and 11.00 a.m. until final report is filed. 5) The petitioner, except for the purpose of complying with the conditions in the bail order, shall not enter the limits of Haripad Police Station for a period of
three months.
6) The petitioner shall not intimidate or attempt to influence the witnesses, nor shall he tamper with the evidence.
7) The petitioner shall not involve in any other offence during the period of bail.
In case of violation of any of the above conditions, the learned Magistrate is empowered to cancel the bail in accordance with law without referring the matter to this court.
On the above conditions, this bail application is allowed.
Sd/- K.P. JYOTHINDRANATH JUDGE //True copy// P.A. TO JUDGE shg/