M/S.Aswathi Detergents & Chemicals v. M/S.Hindustan Lever Ltd.
This judgment came from a scanned document and its text layer is unreliable — words may be garbled. Check the original PDF before relying on any passage.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL THOMAS TUESDAY, THE 4TH DAY OF AUGUST 2015/13TH SRAVANA, 1937 RFA.No. 239 of 2009 ( ) --------------------------------------------- AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN OS 119/2006 of PRINCIPAL SUB COURT,ALAPPUZHA DATED 30-03-2007 APPELLANTS/DEFENDANTS:
------------------------------------------
1. M/S. ASWATHI DETERGENTS & CHEMICALS, A PARTNERSHIP FIRM XVII/1437 B, MULLACKKAL, ALAPPUZHA, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER, SHIRLEY.
2. SHIRELY, MANAGING PARTNER, M/S. ASWATHI DETERGENTS & CHEMICALS.
BY ADV. SRI.A.KRISHNAN RESPONDENT(S)/PLAINTIFF:
------------------------------------------------ M/S. HINDUSTAN LEVER LTD., REGISTERED OFFICE AT 165/166, BACKBAY RECLAMATION, MUMBAI-400 020, REGIONAL OFFICE AT 101, SANTHOME HIGH ROAD, CHENNAI, REPRESENTED THROUGH ITS LAW OFFICER.
R BY ADVs. SRI.P.RADHAKRISHNAN (1) SRI.MADHU RADHAKRISHNAN THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 04-08-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: DG
THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN & SUNIL THOMAS, JJ.
----------------------------------------------------------------- R.F.A.No. 239 of 2009 ------------------------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 4th day of August, 2015
J U D G M E N T
Thottathil B.Radhakrishnan, J.
Learned counsel for the appellants says that his clients have not reached in spite of issuance of notice. The appeal is rejected for non-payment of balance court fee. Refund court fee paid at the time of institution of the appeal to the appellants, through their counsel appearing before this Court. Sd/- (THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN, JUDGE) Sd/- (SUNIL THOMAS, JUDGE) //TRUE COPY// P.A TO JUDGE DG