Nalumakkal Kumaran Vijayakumar v. Renjith Kumar
This judgment came from a scanned document and its text layer is unreliable — words may be garbled. Check the original PDF before relying on any passage.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC & THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE P.V.ASHA TUESDAY, THE 8TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2015/17TH AGRAHAYANA, 1937 RFA.No. 575 of 2008 ( ) ------------------------ AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN OS 90/2005 of ADDL.SUB COURT, IRINJALAKUDA APPELLANT/DEFENDANT:
-------------------- NALUMAKKAL KUMARAN VIJAYAKUMAR 'NALUMAKKAL VEEDU', MARAYAMA MAMGALAM, NEAR PULLUTT KODUNGALLUR, THRISSUR DITRICT.
BY ADV. SRI.K.M.SATHYANATHA MENON RESPONDENT/PLAINTIFF::
---------------------- RANJITH KUMAR, S/O.MUKUNDAN,RESIDING AT 'MUKUND', AGED 43 YEARS, CHIRAKKAL AMSAM & DESOM KANNUR DISTRICT, REPRESENTED BY POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER, K.P.SREENIVASAN S/O.CHATHUNNI, AGED 65 YEARS, VRINDAVAN PAZHANKAVU, VATAKARA AMSOM DESOM, VATAKARA TALUK, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT.
R,R1 BY ADV. SRI.B.KRISHNAN R,R1 BY ADV. SRI.R.PARTHASARATHY THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 08-12-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
ANTONY DOMINIC & P.V ASHA, JJ.
----------------------------------------------------- R.F.A No.575 of 2008-D ---------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 8th day of December, 2015
JUDGMENT
Antony Dominic, J.
In this appeal which was admitted on 05.09.2008, despite opportunities given, balance court fee has not been paid so far. Hence the appeal is rejected for non payment of balance court fee.
Sd/- ANTONY DOMINIC Judge Sd/- P.V.ASHA Judge rtr/ /true copy/ P.S to Judge