Attakoya M.P v. The Administrator

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.M.JOSEPH & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.V.RAMAKRISHNA PILLAI THURSDAY, THE 19TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2013/28TH AGRAHAYANA, 1935 WA.No. 1926 of 2013 () IN WP(C).35361/2010 -------------------------------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 35361/2010 of HIGH COURT OF KERALA DATED APPELLANT(S):

------------------------ ATTAKOYA M.P S/O.SYED SHAIKOYA THANGAL, ANDROTH ISLAND U.T.OF LAKSHADWEEP.

BY ADVS.SRI.N.N.SUGUNAPALAN (SR.) SRI.K.MOHANAKANNAN RESPONDENT(S):

----------------------------

1. ADMINISTRATOR, U.T. OF LAKSHADWEEP, KAVARATTI, PIN-682565.

2. THE SUB DIVISIONAL OFFICER, ANDROTH ISLAND, U.T. OF LAKSHADWEEP, PIN-682555.

3. THE COLLECTOR CUM DEVELOPMENT COMMISSIONER, U.T. OF LAKSHADWEEP, KAVARATTI-682555. R1-3 BY ADV. SRI.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,SC,LAKSHADWEEP ADMN THIS WRIT APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 19-12-2013, ALONG WITH W.A NO.1928/13 & CONNECTED CASES THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WA.No. 1926 of 2013 APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- ANNEXURE-A1-TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER NO.F-34/77/2013/LR DATED 13.12.2013 RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS --------------------------------------- NIL.

// TRUE COPY // P.A. TO JUDGE sou.

K. M. JOSEPH & A.V. RAMAKRISHNA PILLAI, JJ -------------------------------------------------------------- W.A. No. 1926 OF 2013, W.A. No. 1928 OF 2013, W.A. No. 1929 OF 2013 and W.A. No. 1930 OF 2013 -------------------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 19th day of December, 2013

J U D G M E N T

K.M. Joseph, J These appeals are carried by the writ petitioners who were found to be in possession of the Government lands, without any basis, by the District Collector vide Ext.P6 in the Androth Island. Subsequently, they challenged Ext.P7 issued by the Deputy Collector. The learned Single Judge directed that eviction and rehabilitation procedure must go on and it should be completed by 31.12.2013. According to appellants, they are entitled to be rehabilitated and that was the direction.

2. Learned counsel for the respondent on the other hand would point out that on the basis of enquiry, only one person is entitled to be rehabilitated earlier.

In the light of the submission made by the parties, we close

WA. No.1926/13 & conn. cases these appeals leaving it open to the appellants to move the learned Single Judge for Review and to enable the same, we direct that eviction will not be carried out till 10.01.2014. Sd/- K. M. JOSEPH, JUDGE Sd/- A.V. RAMAKRISHNA PILLAI, JUDGE.

Sou.

// True copy //