M. Ahammed Haji v. The Secretary

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.K.ABDUL REHIM FRIDAY, THE 27TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2013/6TH POUSHA, 1935 WP(C).No. 32258 of 2013 (F) ----------------------------------- PETITIONER:

------------------ M. AHAMMED HAJI S/O. MOHAMMED HAJI, MALAYIL HOUSE, A.R.NAGAR MALAPPURAM.

BY ADV. SRI.G.PRABHAKARAN RESPONDENT:

--------------------- THE SECRETARY REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY CUM REGIONAL TRANSPORT OFFICER MALAPPURAM - 676 505.

BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT. V.H. JASMINE THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 27-12-2013, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

W.P (c) No.32258/2013 APPENDIX PETITIONERS' EXHIBITS EXHIBIT - P1 : TRUE COPY OF THE TIMING ISSUED TO THE PETITIONER'S SERVICE ON THE ROUTE EDAVANNAPARA-TIRUR WITH STAGE CARRIAGE KL 10/M 1971 DATED 25-05-2000. EXHIBIT - P2 : TRUE COPY OF THE AGENDA WITH ITS NUMBER G2/136368/2012 ON THE ROUTE KONDOTTY-KOZHIKODE WITH STAGE CARRIAGE KL 10/AL 9566.

EXHIBIT - P3 : TRUE COPY OF THE TIMING VEHICLE No.KL 10/M 4554 ON THE ROUTE EDAVANNAPARA-KAKKAD.

EXHIBIT - P4 : TRUE COPY OF THE RELEVANT PAGES OF TIMING HEARING NOTICE SL. No.22 DATED 19-11-2013.

EXHIBIT - P5 : TRUE COPY OF THE OBJECTION FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE RESPONDENT DATED 05-122013. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS NIL True copy P.A. To Judge AMG

C.K. ABDUL REHIM, J.

------------------------------------------------- W.P.(c) No. 32258 OF 2013-F ------------------------------------------------- DATED THIS THE 27th DAY OF DECEMBER, 2013.

J U D G M E N T

Apprehension of the petitioner is that Ext.P5 objection submitted by him will not be considered in the timing conference which is convened by the respondents on 31-122013. This court finds no basis for such an apprehension. If the petitioner is an existing operator in the route in question, he has got every right to participate in the timing conference and to raise objection. Needless to observe that the respondents should consider such objection and take an appropriate decision.

2.

Therefore the writ petition is disposed of with the above observations permitting the petitioner to participate in the timing conference.

Sd/- C.K. ABDUL REHIM, JUDGE.

AMG True copy P.A to Judge