Gurdial Singh v. Baldev Singh
This judgment came from a scanned document and its text layer is unreliable — words may be garbled. Check the original PDF before relying on any passage.
RSA-719 -1993 (O&M) [1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUN NJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIG RS Da ARH Gurdial S Baldev S SA-719-1993 (O&M) ate of Decision: 11.11.2024 Singh etc.
VERSUS
Singh etc.
...Appellants
...Respondent
ts
CORAM
Present :
: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H HARKESH MANUJA : Mr.P.K.S. Phoolka, Advoc ate for the appellants.
e the respondents.
Mr. C.M. Munjal, Advocate **** HARKES SH MANUJA, J. (ORAL) By way of present appeal, , challenge has been laid to t the judgmen t and decree dated 14.01.199 93 passed by the first Appella ate Court.
2.
Learned counsel for the a appellants submits that desp pite having m made all sincere efforts, he ha as not been able to get in tou uch with the appellants and thus submits s that the present appeal m may kindly be e dismissed for non-prosecutio on.
3.
Thus, it seems that the a appellants are not interested in pursuing the present appeal.
4.
Dismissed for non-prosecu ution.
5.
However, appellants shall be at liberty to seek revival of the same e in case any cause still surviv ves.
6.
Pending miscellaneous a application(s), if any, shall a lso stand dis sposed of.
( HARKESH MANUJA) 11.11.20 sanjay JUDGE ed ?
Yes/No Yes/No Whether speaking/reasone Whether Reportable ?
SANJAY GUPTA 2024.11.11 18:02 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document