Surjit Singh v. State Of Punjab And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM No.M-44143 of 2013 Date of Decision: 24.12.2013 Surjit Singh ..... Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab and others ... Respondent CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV NARAIN RAINA
Present:
Mr. Gurvinder Singh Sidhu, Advocate, for the petitioner.
1. To be referred to the Reporters or not?
2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? RAJIV NARAIN RAINA, J.
The petitioner is himself a complainant and has set the criminal law into motion by lodging an FIR (P-1). What he actually prays for in this petition is blanket anticipatory bail. He alleges police harassment. In the petition, no material particulars of harassment are pleaded as to date, time and place where he says he was called without following due process. No ground is made out to interfere in this matter. Dismissed.
The petitioner would remain at liberty to pursue his remedies as are available in law and to take his request under the Right to Information Act, 2005 to his logical conclusion.
(RAJIV NARAIN RAINA) 24.12.2013 JUDGE manju Mittal Manju 2013.12.24 13:46 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh