THE LAWSMOS LIBRARY

Legal maxims

Legal maxims used in Indian courts, explained with Supreme Court references.

These explanations are research aids. Read the cited judgment for the context and limits of each principle.

8 of 8 entries

Court procedure

Actus curiae neminem gravabit

An act of the court should harm no one.

Courts may correct prejudice caused by their own acts. Its application depends on the facts and the relief legally available.

Read the Supreme Court reference (opens in a new tab)

Supreme Court of India, judgment dated 17 August 2017, paragraph 56

Natural justice

Audi alteram partem

Hear the other side.

A person affected by a decision should have a fair opportunity to be heard. The required procedure depends on the statute and circumstances.

Read the Supreme Court reference (opens in a new tab)

Supreme Court of India, judgment dated 1 September 2025, p. 55

Equity and remedies

Commodum ex injuria sua nemo habere debet

No one should benefit from their own wrong.

A party should not gain a legal advantage through its own wrongful conduct, including misuse of court proceedings.

Read the Supreme Court reference (opens in a new tab)

Supreme Court of India, judgment dated 6 March 2020, paragraph 318

Statutory interpretation

Ejusdem generis

Of the same kind.

General words following a specific list may be limited to the same identifiable class. Legislative purpose and context can require a broader reading.

Read the Supreme Court reference (opens in a new tab)

Supreme Court of India, judgment dated 18 November 2021, p. 18

Natural justice

Nemo judex in causa sua

No one should judge their own cause.

Decision-makers must be impartial. This principle addresses bias and conflicts of interest in adjudication.

Read the Supreme Court reference (opens in a new tab)

Supreme Court of India, judgment dated 1 September 2025, p. 55

Statutory interpretation

Noscitur a sociis

A word is understood by its companions.

Surrounding words can help resolve the meaning of an ambiguous expression. The statutory context remains controlling.

Read the Supreme Court reference (opens in a new tab)

Supreme Court of India, judgment dated 18 November 2021, p. 18

Evidence and negligence

Res ipsa loquitur

The thing speaks for itself.

The circumstances of an accident may support an inference of negligence. The inference depends on the evidence and is not automatic.

Read the Supreme Court reference (opens in a new tab)

Supreme Court of India, judgment dated 5 January 2022, paragraphs 57–58

Civil remedies

Ubi jus ibi remedium

Where there is a right, there is a remedy.

The recognition of a legal right ordinarily carries a means of enforcing it, subject to statutory jurisdiction and procedural rules.

Read the Supreme Court reference (opens in a new tab)

Supreme Court of India, judgment dated 23 March 2026, paragraphs 30–31

Initial collection · Sources reviewed 2026-09-23 · 8 entries